Legal ensuring of forensic activity: modern aspect

Vasyl Ostropilets

National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute», Kharkiv, Ukraine
Ukraine

Abstract

Forensic activity at the current stage of its development is a set of specialized knowledge and procedural rules that govern legal relations related to the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations. The effectiveness of forensic activity depends on a variety of factors: regulatory and legal support, technical equipment and the level of specialized knowledge of each forensic expert.

In our opinion, the mechanism of legal regulation of forensic activity is a process of correspondence with the norms of substantive and procedural law in regularized activity of an expert who conducts research on objects in accordance with certain standards.

Legal ensuring of forensic activity should be considered through the prism of the terms “examination” and “expert”, which today give a clear picture of the forensic activity in general. After all, forensic activitiy ensuring is implemented through the work of an expert, by his performing an independent, objective, qualified examination.

Based on the above, we believe that, firstly, there is an urgent need for accelerated changes in legal ensuring of forensic science, as it will contribute to the creation of optimal conditions for successful professional activity and increase the level of expert ensuring of justice in the country.

Secondly, it is essential to introduce into legislation the provision on the status of a private forensic expert. In our opinion, this innovation may stipulate the following: “Forensic examination may be entrusted to: employees of state specialized institutions of forensic examinations; private experts who are engaged in forensic activities on the basis of a license and who have obtained the relevant qualification”. Thirdly, based on international experience, to develop an effective mechanism of relations between the subjects who implement forensic activities in order to avoid (minimize) contradictions and conflicts between representatives of state specialized institutions of forensic 

Keywords: forensic activity examination legal ensuring mechanism of legal regulation expert

References

Джерел: 26
  • 1
    Afanasʹev, V.S. & Herasymov, A.P. & Hoyman, V.Y. (1996). Obshchaya teoryya prava y hosudarstva [General Theory of Law and State] /pod red. V.V. Lazareva. 2-e yzd. pererab. y dop. M.: Yurystʹ, 1996 472 s. [in Russian].
  • 2
    Chahovets, R.V. & Samsonov, H.V. & Shlepakov A.M. (1975). Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv [Dictionary of foreign words] / hol. red. chlenkorespondent AN URSR O.S. Melʹnychuk. K. Kyyivsʹka knyzhkova fabryka. 775 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 3
    Druchek, O.M. (2013). Ponyattya administratyvno-pravoho zabezpechennya prav, svobod ta interesiv dytyny orhanamy vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrayiny [The concept of administrative and legal support of the rights, freedoms and interests of the child by the internal affairs bodies of Ukraine]. Forum prava. 2013 № 2. S. 123-128. URL: http:/ www.nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index.htm_2013_2_22. [in Ukrainian].
  • 4
    Furman, A.V. (2009). Psykhodydaktychna ekspertyza modulʹnorozvyvalʹnykh pidruchnykiv: monohrafiya [Psychodidactic examination of modular textbooks: a monograph]. Ternopilʹ: TNEU, «Ekonomichna dumka», 2009. 312 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 5
    Holovchenko, L.M. (2013). Pro neobkhidnistʹ vdoskonalennya zakonodavstva pro sudovo-ekspertni diyalʹnistʹ v Ukrayini [On the need to improve the legislation on forensic activities in Ukraine]. Krymynalystyka y sudebnaya ékspertyza: Mezhduvedomstvennyy nauchno-metodycheskyy sbornyk. Vyp. 58, ch. 1 / Otv. red. Y.Y. Emelʹyanova. K.: Mynysterstvo yustytsyy Ukrayny. 472 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 6
    Honcharenko, V.H. Orhanizatsini ta pravovi problemy sudovoyi ekspertyzy v Ukrayini [Organizational and legal problems of judicial examination in Ukraine]. URL http:/ virtuni.education.zp.ua/info_cpu/sites/default/files.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
  • 7
    Klymenko, N. (2013). Z istoriyi rozvytku i stanovlennya Kyyivsʹkoho naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu sudovykh ekspertyz Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny [On the history of development and formation of the Kiev Research Institute of Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine]. Viche. Rubryka «Naukova biblioteka», 2013. № 14.S. 8-12 [in Ukrainian].
  • 8
    Kliuiev, O.M. (2018). Mizhnarodni standarty ta mizhnarodne spivrobitnytstvo u sferi sudovo-ekspertnoyi diyalʹnosti v Ukrayini [International standards and international cooperation in the field of forensic science in Ukraine]. Aktualʹni pytannya sudovoyi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky : materialy mizhnarod. nauk.prakt. konf., prysvyachenoyi 95-richchyu stvorennya Kharkivsʹkoho naukovodoslidnoho instytutu sudovykh ekspertyz im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa (m. Kharkiv, 10–11 zhovtnya 2018 r.). Kharkiv : Pravo, 2018. S. 5-8. [in Ukrainian].
  • 9
    Kliuiev, O. M. (2019). Udoskonalennya ekspertnoho zabezpechennya pravosuddya:teoretychni, pravovi, ta orhanizatsiyni aspekty [Improvement of expert support of justice: theoretical, legal, and organizational aspects]. Teoriya i praktyka sudovoyi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky. Kharkiv : Pravo, 2019. Vyp. 19. S. 102–117. [in Ukrainian].
  • 10
    Kliuiev, O. M. (2016). Pravove rehulyuvannya sudovoyi ekspertyzy v spravakh pro administratyvni pravoporushennya suchasnyy stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Legal Regulation of Forensic Expertise in Administrative Offenses in the Current State and Prospects for Development]. Teoriya ta praktyka sudovoyi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. S. 142-148. URL : http:/ nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Tpsek_2016_16_21 [in Ukrainian].
  • 11
    Kravchenko, O. A. (2013). Pravovi ta orhanizatsiyni problemy rehulyuvannya sudovoekspertnoyi diyalʹnosti [Legal and organizational problems of regulation of forensic expertise]. Vcheni zapysky Tavriysʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu im. V.I. Vernadsʹkoho, Seriya «Yurydychni nauky». 2013. Tom 26 (65), №1. S. 233-237 [in Ukrainian].
  • 12
    Natsyonalʹnyy pravovoy Ynternet-portal Respublyky Belarus [National Legal Internet Portal of the Republic of Belarus]. URL : http:/ pravo.by/document/?guid=3871& p0=H11500293 [in Russian].
  • 13
    Ofytsyalʹnyy sayt Mynysterstva Yustytsyy Respublyky Kazakhstan [Official Website of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. URL : http:/ www. sudexpert.adilet.gov.kz/ru/comment/reply/70895[in Russian].
  • 14
    Polozhennya pro byuro sudovo-medychnoyi ekspertyzy upravlinʹ okhorony zdorov’ya oblasnykh vykonavchykh komitetiv ta respublikansʹke byuro (Avtonomnoyi Respubliky Krym): Nakaz MOZ [Regulation on the Bureau of Forensic Expertise of Health Departments of Oblast Executive Committees and the Republican Bureau (Autonomous Republic of Crimea)]. URL: http:/ zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/z0258-95 [in Ukrainian].
  • 15
    Pro sudovo-ekspertnu diyalʹnistʹ [On Forensic Expertise]: Proekt Zakonu Ukrayiny URL: http:/ w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=61469 [in Ukrainian]. Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 25 lyutoho 1994 roku [Forensic
  • 16
    Examination: Law of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 1994. № 28. St.232 (zi zminamy i dopovnennyamy stanom na 01.04.2020 r.) [in Ukrainian].
  • 17
    Pro zatverdzhennya Instruktsiyi pro pryznachennya ta provedennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsiy z pytanʹ pidhotovky ta pryznachennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ [On approval of the Instruction on the appointment and conduct of judicial examinations and expert studies and Scientific and methodological recommendations on the preparation and appointment of judicial expertise and expert research]. Nakaz Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny. URL : http:/ zakon3. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98$ [in Ukrainian].
  • 18
    Pro zatverdzhennya Polozhennya pro Ekspertnu sluzhbu Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrayiny: Nakaz MVS Ukrayiny [On approval of the Regulation on the Expert Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine]. URL: http:/zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1390-15 [in Ukrainian].
  • 19
    Sehay, M.YA. (2003). Sudova ekspertolohiya: obʹyekt, predmet, pryroda y systema nauky [Forensic expertise: object, subject, nature and system of science]. Teoriya ta praktyka sudovoyi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: zb. nauk.-prakt. Materialiv (do 80 richchya zasnuvannya Kharkivsʹkoho NDI sudovykh ekspertyz) / redkol.: A.P. Zayets, M.L. Tsymbal, ta in. KH.: Pravo, 2003. Vyp.3. 592 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 20
    Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2020). Shchodo neobkhidnosti reformuvannya bazovoho zakonodavstva Ukrayiny pro ekspertne zabezpechennya pravosuddya [On the need to reform the basic legislation of Ukraine on expert support of justice]. Problemy reformuvannya bazovoho zakonodavstva Ukrayiny z pytanʹ ekspertnoho zabezpechennya pravosuddya : materialy kruhloho stolu (m. Kharkiv, 6–7 lyutoho 2020 roku). Kharkiv : FOP Panov, A.M., 2020. S. 12-16. [[in Ukrainian].
  • 21
    Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2017). Do pytannya pro vzayemozalezhnistʹ yevropeysʹkykh intehratsiynykh protsesiv i tendentsiy intehratsiyi spetsialʹnykh znanʹ v Ukrayini [On the need to reform the basic legislation of Ukraine on expert support of justice]. Teoriya ta praktyka sudovoyi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 17. Kharkiv : Pravo, 2017. S. 152-158. [in Ukrainian].
  • 22
    Sabynin, O. (2013). Ekspertyza pochynayetʹsya z eksperta [Expertise begins with the expert]. Okhorona pratsi: naukovo-vyrobnychyy zhurnal. № 9. S. 28-29 [in Russian].
  • 23
    Skakun, O. F. Teoryya hosudarstva y prava (2000). [Theory of State and Law]. Kharʹkіv: Konsul; Un-t vnutr. del, 704 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 24
    Soroka, S.O. & Shpak, YU.V. (2018). Yevropeysʹkiy dosvid orhanizatsiyi sudovoekspertnoyi diyalʹnosti [European experience in organizing forensic activities]. URL: http:/ pap.in.ua/3_2018/82.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
  • 25
    Transparency International. URL: http:/ cpi.tranparency.org.cpi/2011/results/; Natsyonalʹnyy pravovoy Ynternet-portal Respublyky Belarusʹ URL: http:/ pravo. by/document/?guid=3871&p0=H11500293. Tsvik, M.V. & Tkachenko, V.D. & Bohachova L.L. (2002). Zahalʹna teoriya derzhavy ta prava [General Theory of State and Law]. za red. M.V. Tsvika, V.D. Tkachenka, O.V. Petryshyna. KH.: «Pravo». 427 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 26
    Velykyy tlumachnyy slovnyk suchasnoyi ukrayinsʹkoyi movy [A great explanatory dictionary of modern Ukrainian] uklad. I hol. red. V.T. Busel,. K.: Irpinʹ: VTF «Perun», 2002 r. 1440 s. [in Ukrainian].
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.

Full Text

1097

How to Cite

[1]
Ostropilets V. Legal ensuring of forensic activity: modern aspect. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2020. Т. 1. С. 120–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.1.2020.10.
Copied!