Directions of application of international experience of staffing of forensic institutions in ukraine
Abstract
The article stipulates that national forensic examination can not exist in isolation, only within a single state, it is essential for forensic institutions to promote international cooperation in order to exchange experience, take into consideration modern achievements of science and technology, create specialized areas for expert research. It is stressed that forensic institutions of Ukraine have chosen the path of joining the communities of international forensic institutions, making it possible to improve staffing. The author noted that the purpose of the community of European forensic institutions is to promote: science and research in the field of forensic science; international cooperation in the field of forensic activities; quality of expert research and competence of forensic experts; education and training of forensic experts; developments in forensic science.
It is emphasized that the realization of integration of forensic activities, as a result, always aims at harmonizing and improving expert legislation, deepening the theoretical foundations of forensic science, developing of common guidelines for different types of examinations, obtaining international recognition of expert opinion in general, further developing of forensic science, improving professional skills of the staff of forensic institutions.
It is proved that as a result of the analysis of foreign experience of forensic institutions staffing the following directions of its possible implementation in Ukraine were suggested, such as: development of the European model of ensuring maximum independence and competition of forensic experts; intensification and expansion of participation in the international network of forensic institutions; focus on the training of forensic experts from the «children’s university» on the basis of higher education institutions, which also provide for appropriate internship programs; practice of experts training according to corresponding program under the guidance of a mentor from among highly qualified forensic experts; application of the combined extraordinary certification of forensic experts in case of reasonable doubts as to the required level of professional training, etc.
References
Джерел:
21
References
Джерел: 21-
1
Avdieieva H. Problemy harmonizatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy u haluzi sudovoi ekspertyzy iz zakonodavstvom krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Pravova doktryna — osnova formuvannia pravovoi systemy derzhavy : materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 20-richchiu NAPrN Ukrainy ta obhovorenniu piatytom. monohr. «Pravova doktryna Ukrainy» (Kharkiv, 20–21 lystop. 2013 r.) / Nats. akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy. Kharkiv, 2013. S. 634–637 [in Ukrainian].
-
2
Bekbukatova T. M., Borodaev V. E. O mezhdunarodnom-pravovom sotrudnichistve v sfere sudebno-jekspertnoj dejatel’nosti v ramkah Evrazijskogo jekonomicheskogo soobshhestva. Teorija i praktika sudebnoj jekspertizy. 2013. № 2 (30). S. 132–138 [in Russian].
-
3
Cherednichenko D., Ananin O. Sudova ekspertyza v umovakh vprovadzhennia intehrovanoho upravlinnia kordonamy. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. 2017. Vypusk 3. URL: https:/nadpsu.edu.ua/wpcontent/uploads/2018/11/visnik_3_2017_ur.pdf (data zvernennia 29.04.2020) [in Ukrainian].
-
4
Cokolova O. I., Nikitina I. Je. Organizacija sudebnoj jekspertizy v Evropejskih stranah: istoricheskij aspekt i sovremennye tendencii. Nauchnyj portal MVD Rossii. 2011.№ 2. S. 119–123 [in Russian].
-
5
Hasparian S. H. Pro neobkhidnist udoskonalennia protsesu pidvyshchennia kvalifikatsii kadriv sudovo-ekspertnykh ustanov. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt.konf., prysviach. 95-richchiu stvorennia KhNDISE im. Zasl. prof. M.S. Bokariusa (Kharkiv, 10–11 zhovt. 2018 r.). Kharkiv, 2018. S. 42–44 [in Ukrainian].
-
6
Haziev Sh. M. O Evropejskoj seti sudebno-jekspertnyj uchrezhdenij. Advokat. 2005. № 8. S. 132-138. URL: http:/ base.garant.ru/5174944/ (data zvernennja 29.04.2020) [in Russian].
-
7
Hora I. V. Suchasni problemy sudovoi ekspertyzy v aspekti yevrointehratsii Ukrainy. URL: http:/ arlguvd/lg/ua>d14201.html (data zvernennia 29.04.2020) [in Ukrainian].
-
8
Jan de Kinder. Evropejskaja set’ sudebno-jekspertnyh uchrezhdenij (ENFSI). Teorija i praktika sudebnoj jekspertizy. 2011. № 4 (24). S. 200–204 [in Russian].
-
9
Jukseloglu Je. H., Jonar F. Ch., Rajimoglu, Karatas O., Ashikioglu F. Sudebnojekpertnoe obrazovanie v Turcii: na primere instituta sudebnoj mediciny. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky : zb. materialiv mizhnar. nauk. prakt. konf., prysviach. 100-richchiu vid dnia narodzh. d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., zasl. diiacha nauky i tekhniky Ukrainy M. V. Saltevskoho (Kharkiv, 7-8 lystop. 2017 r.). Kharkiv : Pravo, 2017. S. 52–54 [in Russian].
-
10
Kataraga O. Aspekty akkredatacii sudebno-jekpertnyh laboratorij. Koncepcіja akreditacії u sferі sudovo-ekspertnoї dіjal’nostі : zb. materіalіv mіzhnar. nauk.prakt. semіnaru (Harkіv, 2 bereznja. 2018) / M-vo justicії Ukraїni; Harkіvs’kij NDІSE. Harkіv : Zolotі storіnki, 2018. S. 4–9 [in Russian].
-
11
Klimenko N.I., Kupriievych O. A. Mizhnarodne spivrobitnytstvo sudovo-ekspertnykh ustanov. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva. № 4/2015. S. 130-134 [in Ukrainian].
-
12
Klimenko N. I., Strinzha V. K. K voprosu o podgotovke jekspertov. Kriminalistika i sudebnaja jekspertiza. Kiev : Vishha shk., 1989. Vyp. 39. S. 25-28 [in Russian].
-
13
Lazebnyi A. M. Mizhnarodnyi dosvid vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan pid chas rozsliduvannia kryminalnykh pravoporushen proty hromadskoho poriadku. Mizhnarodnyi yurydychnyi visnyk : zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoho universytetu derzhavnoi podatkovoi sluzhby Ukrainy. 2016. Vyp. 1 (3). S. 85–90 [in Ukrainian].
-
14
Mizhnarodna orhanizatsiia iz standartyzatsii (ISO) URL: http:/ pidruchniki. com/16520205/ekonomika/mizhnarodna_organizatsiya_standartizatsiyi_iso. (data zvernennia 29.04.2020) [in Ukrainian].
-
15
Pampukha H. H. Shchodo perspektyv rozvytku mizhnarodnoi sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti. Aktualni pytannia standartyzatsii sudovo-ekspertnoho zabezpechennia pravosuddia v Ukraini. Perspektyvy rozvytku: mat. mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysv. 105-richchiu sudovoi ekspertyzy v Ukraini ta 95-richchiu z dnia narodzhennia akademika M. Ya. Sehaia (m. Kyiv, 4–5 lypnia 2018). Kyiv : KNISE Miniust. Ukrainy, 2018. S. 179-182 [in Ukrainian].
-
16
Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: zakon Ukrainy vid 25.02.1994 r. № 4038-XII. (zi zminamy ta dopovnenniamy). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. (VVR). 1994. № 28. St. 232 [in Ukrainian].
-
17
Rossinskaja E. R. Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «O gossudarstvennoj jekspertnoj dejatel’nosti v Rossijskoj Federacii». Moskva: Pravo i zakon; Jurajtizdat., 2002. 384 s. [in Russian].
-
18
Rusetskyi A. A. Pro orhanizatsiiu sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti: mizhnarodnyi aspekt. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: zb. nauk. pr. Kharkiv, 2017. Vyp. 17. S. 158–164 [in Ukrainian].
-
19
Shapoval M. I. Menedzhment yakosti: navch. posib. Kyiv. T-vo Znannia, KOO. 2007. 471 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
20
Status orhanizatsii / ustanov, shcho provodiat sudovo-medychni, sudovopsykhiatrychni ta sudovo-psykholohichni ekspertyzy v krainakh SND. URL: http:/ medicallaw.org.ua/fileadmin/user_upload/SND.PDF. (data zvernennia 29.04.2020) [in Ukrainian].
-
21
Titanjan Je. L. Professija – sudebnyj jekspert. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky: zb. materialiv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 100-richchiu vid dnia narodzh. d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., zasl. diiacha nauky i tekhniky Ukrainy M. V. Saltevskoho (Kharkiv, 7-8 lystop. 2017 r.). Kharkiv: Pravo, 2017. S. 60 [in Ukrainian].