Editorial Cycle
Legal and tactical principles of review of documents received from business entities
Abstract
Awareness of the role and importance of documents in proving economic criminal offenses has necessitated the solution of such a goal as to determine the legal and tactical principles of reviewing documents provided by a business entity for inclusion in the materials of criminal proceedings. Based on the analysis, specifics of reviewing documents provided by a business entity within the framework of criminal proceedings have been clarified. It has been determined that reviewing documents as an independent investigative (search) action must be carried out in compliance with the established legal principles and relevant tactical conditions. Taking into account the source of receipt of documents (voluntary provision, requisition, etc.), procedure for their procedural consolidation, the possibility of their inclusion in the materials of the proceedings, as well as the initiative of the parties in submitting them, has been substantiated. It has been emphasized that the review contributes to the identification of both the substantive characteristics of documents and signs of their falsification. Feasibility of making copies of electronic documents during the review has been considered, as well as the possibility of granting them the status of physical evidence. The list of tactical conditions for conducting inspection has been specified, including the location, volume and nature of documents, the need to involve specialists, identifying traces and making a decision on further expert research. A conclusion has been made about the complex nature of inspection as an action that combines procedural requirements and forensic expediency.
References
Джерел:
19
References
Джерел: 19-
1
Amelina A. S., Kuzhilna A. B. (2019). Ohliad dokumentiv pry rozsliduvanni zlochyniv u sferi opodatkuvannia. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. № 6. 362–365. [in Ukrainian].
-
2
Bezzubenko M. V. (2021). Osnovy metodyky rozsliduvannia ukhylen vid splaty yedynoho vnesku na zahalnoobov’iazkove derzhavne sotsialne strakhuvannia ta strakhovykh vneskiv na zahalnoobov’iazkove derzhavne pensiine strakhuvannia: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
-
3
Bidniak H. (2016). Uchast spetsialista u provedenni ohliadu dokumentiv pid chas rozsliduvannia shakhraistv. Kryminalistychnyi visnyk. № 1. 162–166. [in Ukrainian].
-
4
Vyrok Suvorovskoho raionnoho sudu m. Odesy vid 04.03.2024 u spravi № 523/3384/21. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/117423536 [in Ukrainian].
-
5
Zarubenko O. V. (2012). Taktyka ohliadu dokumentiv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Aktualni problemy vdoskonalennia chynnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy. № 29. 240–250. [in Ukrainian].
-
6
Kalinina I. V. (2011). Zavdannia slidchoho ohliadu dokumentiv u spravakh pro hospodarski zlochyny, pov’iazani z pidroblenniam dokumentiv. Mytna sprava. № 4 (76). Ch. 2. 215–221 [in Ukrainian].
-
7
Kovalenko A. M. (2017). Osoblyvosti taktyky ohliadu elektronnykh dokumentiv pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia posiahan na zhyttia ta zdorov’ia zhurnalista. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. № 1(88). 182–191 [in Ukrainian].
-
8
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651-VI (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
9
Ohliad sudovoi praktyky Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu shchodo vyznannia dokaziv nedopustymymy. Rishennia, vneseni do YeDRSR, za period z 2018 roku po cherven 2021 roku / uporiad. V. V. Shchepotkina. Kyiv. 2021 [in Ukrainian].
-
10
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 18.06.2020 r., u spravi № 740/2536/17 (provadzhennia № 51-634km19). Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: ofits. sait. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89929185. [in Ukrainian].
-
11
Potomska N. A., Bobik V. P. (2011). Poniattia i vydy slidchoho doslidzhennia dokumentiv u spravakh pro zlochyny u sferi opodatkuvannia. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Mizhrehionalnoi finansovo-iurydychnoi akademii (ekonomika, pravo). № 1. 114–120 [in Ukrainian].
-
12
Potomska N. A., Hrytsiuk I. V., Milevskyi O. O. (2013). Zbyrannia i doslidzhennia dokumentiv pry rozsliduvanni ukhylen vid splaty podatkiv, zboriv (obov’iazkovykh platezhiv): monohrafiia. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
-
13
Pro deiaki pytannia praktyky vyrishennia sporiv, pov’iazanykh iz zakhystom prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti: Postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho Hospodarskoho sudu Ukrainy vid 17.10.2012 roku № 12. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0012600-12 [in Ukrainian].
-
14
Pro elektronni dokumenty ta elektronnyi dokumentoobih: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22.05.2003 № 851-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/851-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
15
Ratnova A. V. (2021). Kryminalni protsesualni ta kryminalistychni osnovy vykorystannia elektronnykh dokumentiv u dokazuvanni: dys. … d-ra filosofii: 081 Pravo. Lviv. 61-63 [in Ukrainian].
-
16
Tymofieieva N. V. (2017). Uchast spetsialista v ohliadi dokumentiv pid chas rozsliduvannia zlochyniv proty bezpeky vyrobnytstva. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav. № 1. 278–287 [in Ukrainian].
-
17
Khyzhniak Ye. (2017). Osoblyvosti ohliadu elektronnykh dokumentiv pid chas rozsliduvannia kryminalnykh pravoporushen. Derzhava ta rehiony. № 4 (58). 80– 85 [in Ukrainian].
-
18
Khyzhniak Ye. (2017). Taktychni pryiomy provedennia slidchoho ohliadu dokumentiv. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. T. 3. 207–211 [in Ukrainian].