Editorial Cycle
Obtaining Evidence by the Defense Counsel: Certain Ways to Resolve Existing Problems
Abstract
A defense counsel plays an essential in the implementation of interna- tional standards for protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms.
The legal literature and court practice have repeatedly emphasized the fact that the scope of authority of a defense counsel to defend a suspect or ac- cused is limited and does not meet the principles of equality of arms, adver- sariality, etc. However, most of the proposed recommendations and sugges- tions remain unimplemented. We stress the issue of obtaining evidence by the defense counsel in a criminal proceeding at all stages of defense. In this respect, the Article Purpose is formulated as clarifying the state of legislative support for obtaining evidence by a defense counsel in a criminal proceed- ing, presenting a proposal for improving the system of criminal procedure legislation.
Having generalized theoretical developments and considered current needs of human rights practice, the author formulates proposals for amend- ing the Law of Ukraine “On the Bar and Legal Practice”, and also outlines the author’s vision on certain aspects of obtaining evidence by a defense coun- sel in a criminal proceeding.
References
Джерел:
18
References
Джерел: 18-
1
Dulskyi, O. L. (2024). Osoblyvosti kryminalistychnoho zabezpechennia zbyrannia dokaziv pid chas provedennia nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo. № 2. S. 668-674. [in Ukrainian].
-
2
Farynnyk, V. I. (2018). Teoretychni, pravovi ta prakseolohichni problemy zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia v kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy : dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk : 12.00.09. Kyiv, 2018. 565 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
3
Kalinovska, A. V. (2020). Dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu provadzhenni na stadii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia : dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyiv. 235 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
4
Kalinovska, M. O. (2018). Storona zakhystu yak sub’iekt dokazuvannia pid chas zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv na stadii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Treti Tavriiski yurydychni naukovi chytannia: materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii (m. Kyiv, 18-19 travnia 2018 r.). Kyiv : Tavriiskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. S. 73-76. [in Ukrainian].
-
5
Kazmirova, I. B. (2018). Tymchasovyi dostup do rechei i dokumentiv chy advokatskyi zapyt? Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. № 6/18. S. 360–363. [in Ukrainian].
-
6
Krushenytskyi, A. V. (2023). Vytrebuvannia ta otrymannia rechei i dokumentiv yak zasib zbyrannia dokaziv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni : dys. … d-ra filosofii: 081 Pravo. Kropyvnytskyi. 246 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
7
Krushynskyi, S. A. (2014). Podannia dokaziv u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Lviv. 242 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
8
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651- VI. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/-4651-17 [in Ukrainian].
-
9
Kulyk, M. Y., Tereshchenko, Yu. V., Bondarchuk, A. S. (2023). Osoblyvosti vykorystannia zakhysnykom spetsialnykh znan u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu: seriia: Pravo / holov. red. Yu. M. Bysaha. Uzhhorod. T. 2. Vyp. 80. S. 160-165. [in Ukrainian].
-
10
Masliuk, O. V. (2017). Protsesualna diialnist zakhysnyka zi sprostuvannia pidozry (obvynuvachennia) : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.09. Lviv. 217 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
11
Nazarenko, D. M. (2024). Napriamy vykorystannia tsyfrovoi kryminalistyky v umovakh voiennoho stanu. Informatsiini modeliuiuchi tekhnolohii, systemy ta kompleksy: V mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia. 18-19 kvitnia 2024 r., Cherkasy, Ukraina. Cherkasy: Cherkaskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Bohdana Khmelnytskoho. 2024. S. 143-145. [in Ukrainian].
-
12
Popeliushko, V. O. (2005). Predmet zakhystu ta yoho dokazuvannia v kryminalnii spravi : monohrafiia. Kyiv : Pretsedent. 232 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
13
Popeliushko, V. O. (2010). Funktsiia zakhystu v kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy: pravovi, teoretychni ta prykladni problemy : monohrafiia. 2-he vydannia, zminene i dopovnene. Ostroh: Ostrozka akademiia. 600 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
14
Pro advokaturu ta advokatsku diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy vid 5 lypnia 2012 r. No 5076- VI. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5076-17 [in Ukrainian].
-
15
Skriabin, O. M. (2014). Uchast advokata pry vyrishenni pytannia pro obrannia pidozriuvanomu, obvynuvachenomu zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi trymannia pid vartoiu. Derzhava ta rehiony. № 2 (44). S. 143-148. [in Ukrainian].
-
16
Soloviov, V. O. (2021). Zakhysnyk yak sub’iekt dokazuvannia pry obranni, zmini, skasuvanni zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia slidchym suddeiu : dys. … d-ra filosofii: 081 Pravo. Odesa. 233 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
17
Torbas, O. O. (2024). OSINT pry rozsliduvanni kryminalnykh pravoporushen : pidruchnyk. Odesa : Vydavnytstvo «Iurydyka». 180 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
18
Vynokurov, O. V. (2016). Zakhyst prav pidozriuvanoho pid chas obrannia zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi trymannia pid vartoiu. Aktualni pytannia vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. № 2. S. 134-137. [in Ukrainian].