Editorial Cycle
The Oath Concept: Basis for Dismissal from Office “for Breach of Oath” and System of Guarantees for Labor Rights Protection
Abstract
The specified article studies the oath concepts, “breach of oath”, and the dismissal of a special subject — a judge — on this basis. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the norms governing the procedure and process of dismissal from office are effective, taking into account high standards im- posed on judges (both in their appointment to the office and in the adminis- tration of justice), and should serve as a reliable safeguard against wrongful dismissals. Each stage of a disciplinary proceeding involving a judge must uphold labor guarantees of rights security that cannot be violated. The pa- per summarizes that dismissal from office should take place considering the provisions of the Labor Code of Ukraine, along with the norms of special leg- islation defining the status of a judge. In addition, there should be an effective system of guarantees for the protection of labor rights, which should operate in today’s conditions.
References
Джерел:
18
References
Джерел: 18-
1
Kotliarevskiy, H. S., Nazarov, B. L. (1973). Problemy teoryy prava. [in Ukrainian].
-
2
Pro sudoustriy i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 N 1402-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
3
Case of Minelli v Switzerland (App. no. 8660/79) ECHR, 25 March 1983. European Court of Human Rights: website. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-57540
-
4
Rehlament Yevropeyskoho sudu z prav liudyny vid 01.11.2003 (Pravylo 3. Prysiaha abo urochysta zaiava). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_067#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
5
Pro status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 15.12.1992 N 2862-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2862-12#Text Vtratyv chynnist vid 01.01.2012. [in Ukrainian].
-
6
Maliarenko, A. V. (2012). Pro prysiahu suddi ta vidpovidalnist za ii porushennia. Visnyk Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy. #2. 26–30. [in Ukrainian].
-
7
Prylutskyi, S.V. (2001). Prysiaha suddi: stara katehoriia – novyi pravovyi zmist. Pravo Ukrainy. № 6. 105. [in Ukrainian].
-
8
Kodeks zakoniv pro pratsiu Ukrainy: Zakon vid 10.12.1971 N 322- VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/322-08#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
9
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 r. № 254k/96-VR. Redaktsiia vid 02.03.2014. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
-
10
Wydick, R. (2005). Plain English for Lawyers. 5th ed. Durham: Carolina Academic Press
-
11
Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Oleksandr Volkov proty Ukrainy» vid 09.01.2013. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_947#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
12
Pro Vyshchu Radu Pravosuddia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 21.12.2016 № 1798-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
13
Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho sudu vid 04.04.2024 po spravi № 990/194/23. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/118297145 [in Ukrainian].
-
14
Soldatova, V. D. (2010). Sutnist ta zahalna kharakterystyka yurydychnykh harantiy zakonnosti v administratyvniy diialnosti OVS Ukrainy. Forum prava. #4. 846–852. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/FP/2010-4/10cvddou.pdf [in Ukrainian].
-
15
Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava (2002). Kharkiv : Pravo. [in Ukrainian].
-
16
Dzhepa, Yu. A. (2009). Yurydychni harantii prava na pratsiu pry prypynenni trudovykh pravovidnosyn: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.05. Luhansk. [in Ukrainian].
-
17
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 r. № 254k/96-VR. Redaktsiia vid 01.01.2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
-
18
Kartuzova, I. O., Osadchyy, A. Yu. (2008). Administratyvno-protsedurne pravo. Odesa : Yuryd. l-ra. [in Ukrainian].