Article History

Stages of Investigation of Interference With The Activities of Public Authorities

Volodymyr Popov

National Scientific Center "Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute" of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Ukraine

Abstract

The article examines the issues of periodization of pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses related to interference with the activities of public authorities. The author substantiates the need to distinguish four stages of pre-trial investigation: initial, initial, subsequent and final. The author identifies the features and tasks of each of them, and focuses on the specifics of organizational, procedural and tactical actions at each stage of the proceedings. Particular attention is paid to the problems of latency of such offenses, difficulties in recording primary information, and attempts of external interference with the investigation process, especially at its final stage. The author emphasizes the importance of interaction between investigators, operational units and other entities as a key condition for an effective procedural response. The proposed periodization makes it possible to ensure the systematic and tactical flexibility of pre-trial investigation, which is particularly relevant in cases of criminal offenses against public authorities.

Keywords: pre-trial investigation stage interference with activities public authority tactical task.

References

Джерел: 24
  • 1
    Beschastnyi, V. M., Oderii, O. V. (2017). Vidkryttia kryminalnoho provadzhennia (teoretyko-prykladnyi aspekt). Protsesualne ta kryminalistychne zabezpechennia dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: zb. tez nauk.-prakt. seminaru (m. Lviv, 01 hrud. 2017 r.). Lviv: LvDUVS. S. 26–30 [in Ukrainian].
  • 2
    Vakulik, O. A. (2013). Reformuvannia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva v chastyni rehlamentatsii pochatku dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, № 4, S. 160–166 [in Ukrainian].
  • 3
    Volobuiev, A. F. (1999). Etapy rozsliduvannia v kryminalistychnii metodytsi. Visnyk Universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, № 5, S. 28–37 [in Ukrainian].
  • 4
    Volobuiev, A. F. (2001). Naukovi osnovy kompleksnoi metodyky rozsliduvannia koryslyvykh zlochyniv u sferi pidpryiemnytstva: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv. 185 s [in Ukrainian].
  • 5
    Hurtiieva, L. M. (2017). Pochatok kryminalnoho provadzhennia Ukrainy ta stadii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Pravova derzhava, № 25, S. 155–159 [in Ukrainian].
  • 6
    Husieva, V. O. (2021). Teoretychni osnovy metodyky rozsliduvannia zlochyniv proty avtorytetu orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady u sferi pravookhoronnoi diialnosti: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv. 538 s [in Ukrainian].
  • 7
    Zhuravel, V. A. (2015). Pochatok dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: deiaki protsesualni ta orhanizatsiino-taktychni problemy. Visnyk Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav imeni E.O. Didorenka, № 1, S. 250–259 [in Ukrainian].
  • 8
    Zhuravel, V. A. (2014). Problemy periodyzatsii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, № 2(77), S. 136–144 [in Ukrainian].
  • 9
    Kolesnychenko, A. N. (1967). Nauchnыe y pravovыe osnovы metodyky rassledovanyia otdelnыkh vydov prestuplenyi: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkov. 509 s [in Ukrainian].
  • 10
    Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text (data zvernennia: 11.10.2025) [in Ukrainian].
  • 11
    Lapkin, A. V. (2021). Kryminalistychnyi pidkhid do periodyzatsii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Innovatsii v kryminalistytsi ta sudovii ekspertyzi: materialy mizhvidom. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Kyiv, 25 lystop. 2021 r.). Kyiv: Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav. S. 35–38 [in Ukrainian].
  • 12
    Lunhu, V. Y. (1991). Pervonachalnуi еtap rassledovanyia prestuplenyi (protsessualnуi y orhanyzatsyonnуi aspektу): avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyev. 25 s [in Ukrainian].
  • 13
    Moskalenko, H. V. (2009). Poniattia ta osoblyvosti etapiv rozsliduvannia zlochyniv. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, № 49, S. 376–380 [in Ukrainian].
  • 14
    Oderii, O. V. (2015). Teoretychne osmyslennia pochatkovoho etapu dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Visnyk Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav imeni E.O. Didorenka, № 4, S. 258–263 [in Ukrainian].
  • 15
    Pyrih, I. (2021). Poniattia ta kharakterystyka etapiv rozsliduvannia u kryminalistytsi. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, Spets. vyp. № 2 (115), S. 163–168. DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2021-6-163-168 [in Ukrainian].
  • 16
    Pohoretskyi, M. A. (2015). Pochatok dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: okremi problemni pytannia. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, № 1, S. 93–103 [in Ukrainian].
  • 17
    Pchelina, O. V. (2017). Teoretychni osnovy formuvannia ta realizatsii metodyky rozsliduvannia zlochyniv v sferi sluzhbovoi diialnosti: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: TOV «V spravi». 247 s [in Ukrainian].
  • 18
    Pchelina, O. (2016). Etapizatsiia protsesu rozsliduvannia zlochyniv u sferi sluzhbovoi diialnosti. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, № 3, S. 167–170 [in Ukrainian].
  • 19
    Rusanivska, D. D. (2023). Rozsliduvannia vtruchannia v diialnist zakhysnyka chy predstavnyka osoby: dys. … d-ra filosof.: 081 Pravo. Kyiv. 260 s [in Ukrainian].
  • 20
    Samoilenko, O. A. (2019). Pochatok kryminalnoho provadzhennia (z pozytsii kryminalistychnoi nauky). Pravo i suspilstvo, № 2, S. 226–231 [in Ukrainian].
  • 21
    Stepaniuk, R. L. (2012). Kryminalistychne zabezpechennia rozsliduvannia zlochyniv, vchynenykh u biudzhetnii sferi Ukrainy: monohrafiia; za zah. red. d-ra yuryd. nauk prof. A. F. Volobuieva. Kharkiv: Nika Nova. 382 s [in Ukrainian].
  • 22
    Toporetska, Z. M. (2015). Osoblyvosti pochatku kryminalnoho provadzhennia po faktakh zainiattia hralnym biznesom. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, № 1, S. 127–132 [in Ukrainian].
  • 23
    Cherniavskyi, S. S. (2016). Zakonodavche udoskonalennia pochatku kryminalnoho provadzhennia yak chynnyk pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti protydii zlochynnosti. Kryminolohichna teoriia i praktyka: dosvid, problemy sohodennia ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia: mater. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Kyiv, 26 berez. 2016 r.). Kyiv: NAVS. S. 32–36 [in Ukrainian].
  • 24
    Shevchuk, V. M. (2013). Taktychni operatsii u kryminalistytsi: teoretychni zasady formuvannia ta praktyka realizatsii: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: Vyd. ahentsiia «Apostil». 440 s [in Ukrainian].
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.
Preview Article

How to Cite

[1]
Popov V. Stages of Investigation of Interference With The Activities of Public Authorities. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2025. Т. 12, № 2. С. 114–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.12.2025.12.
Copied!