Editorial Cycle
Tactics of Interrogation of a Suspect in Crimes Against Justice
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to determine the tactical features of interrogation of persons who are professional participants in court proceedings who have committed crimes against justice Based on the searches conducted, the relevance of the study is substantiated given the high level of legal awareness of these persons, their ability to consciously counteract the investigation and use procedural guarantees as a means of counteraction. It is established that the effectiveness of interrogation in such proceedings largely depends on the level of tactical training of the investigator, the ability to adapt to the conditions of procedural confrontation and compliance with legal standards, in particular, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The author reveals the importance of the crime scene for the formation of investigative versions and interrogation planning, emphasizes the importance of studying the personality of the suspect, preliminary modeling of possible behavioral strategies and alternative scenarios of investigative (detective) action. The author analyzes the psychological aspects of interrogation, in particular, the impact of stress on the suspect's behavior, the need to overcome the defensive dominance and establish effective communication contact. The author substantiates the expediency of defense counsel's participation as a guarantor of a person's rights, but emphasizes that his presence complicates the nature of the investigative (detective) action and requires increased flexibility from the investigator. The author concludes that a systematic approach to the organization of interrogation is necessary, which includes legal validity, tactical variability and psychological preparedness as the basis for effective obtaining of reliable and admissible information within criminal proceedings.
References
Джерел:
10
References
Джерел: 10-
1
1. Chornohus Yu., Vlasenko, S. (2022). Osoblyvosti taktyky dopytu v protsesi rozsliduvannia nezakonnoho zavolodinnia transportnym zasobom. Yurydychna psykholohiia, 30(1), 74-79 [in Ukrainian].
-
2
2. Hryshchenko N. V. (2012). Taktyka dopytu pidozriuvanoho z uchastiu zakhysnyka (Dysertatsiia kandidata yurydychnykh nauk, 12.00.09). Zaporizhzhia [in Ukrainian].
-
3
3. Husieva V. O. (2018). Osoblyvosti taktyky dopytu pidozriuvanoho pid chas rozsliduvannia posiahan na zhyttia pratsivnyka pravookhoronnoho orhanu. Visnyk LDUVS im. E. O. Didorenka, 2(82), 221-226 [in Ukrainian].
-
4
4. Hvozdiuk V. (2020). Taktyka dopytu pidozriuvanoho v kryminalnomu provadzhenni vidpovidno do praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny. Yurydychna psykholohiia, 27, 95-102 [in Ukrainian].
-
5
5. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254k/96-VR. BD «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» / VR Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254k/96-vr [in Ukrainian].
-
6
6. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudy «Sprava Afanasiev proty Ukrainy» (zaiava No. 38722/02): vid 5 kvit. 2005 r [Decision of the European Court of Human Rights «Case of Afanasiev v. Ukraine» (application No. 38722/02) from April 5, 2005]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_239#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
7
7. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudy «Sprava Nechyporuk i Yonkalo proty Ukrainy» (zaiava No. 42310/04): vid 21 lyp. 2011 r [Decision of the European Court of Human Rights «Case of Nechyporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine» (application No. 42310/04) from July 21, 2011]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_683#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
8
8. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny «Sprava Hefhen proty Nimechchyny» (zaiava No. 22978/05): vid 1 cherv. 2010 r [Decision of the European Court of Human Rights «Case of Gäfgen v. Germany» (application No. 22978/05) from June 1, 2010]. (n.d.). HUDOC. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#(%22itemid%22[%22001-179168%22]} [in Ukrainian].
-
9
9. Rishennia Yevropeiskoi komisii z prav liudyny «Sprava Aksoi v. Turtsii» (zaiava No. 21987/93): vid 18 hrud. 1996 r [Decision of the European Commission of Human Rights "Case of Aksoy v. Turkey" (application No. 21987/93) from December 18, 1996]. (n.d.). precedent.in.ua. URL: https://precedent.in.ua/2016/04/08/aksoj-protyv-turtsyy/ [in Ukrainian].
-
10
10. Veselskyi V. K., Kuzmichov V. S., Matsyshyn V. S., Starushkevych A. V. (2004). Osoblyvosti provadzhennia dopytu pidozriuvanoho (obvynuvachenoho) z metoiu nedopushchennia tortur ta inshykh porushen prav liudyny: Posibnyk. Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy. 148 s [in Ukrainian].