ISSN 2709-099X e-ISSN 2709-1007
Login
Bokarius Logo

National Scientific Center

"Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute"

of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences

Submit Paper
https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.5.2022.03

Capabilities Of The Defense Counsel While Pre-Trial Investigation Of Criminal Offenses In The Field Of Official Activities (Review article)

Oleksii Kucher

Head of the State Regulatory Service of Ukraine
Ukraine
ORCID Email

Abstract

The research paper considers provisions of the current criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine, current developments in criminal procedure science, issues of participation of the defense counsel in criminal proceedings on criminal offenses in the field of official activities, in particular while collection, assessment and provision of evidence. The idea concept has been clarified: the main place in ensuring fair justice, in particular in criminal proceedings on crimes in the field of official activities, belongs to a professional defense counsel, that is, a qualified advocate who possesses professional knowledge and practical work skills. On this basis, it has been summarized that only advocacy is founded on verification of professional knowledge, compliance with the Rules of Advocate’s Ethics, disciplinary responsibility, etc.

Keywords: advocate defense counsel criminal proceedings criminal offense evidence pre-trial investigation

References

Джерел: 45
  • 1
    Edward Michael Johnston (2019) The Defence Lawyer In The Modern Era. (LL.B Hons) (UWE, Bristol), LL.M (UWE, Bristol). 2019. 341 р. [in English].
  • 2
    Mykola Nechyporuk, Oleksandr Kliuiev, Aleksandar Ivanović, Nataliia Filipenko (2021) Development Strategy of International Cooperation of Forensic Science Institutions of Ukraine with Foreign Experts in Prevention of Terrorist Attacks on Aerospace Industry and Critical Infrastructure. Integrated Computer Technologies in Mechanical Engineering – 2021. Synergetic Engineering Рр. 825-848. Presents the proceedings of the ICTM´21 Conference held in Kharkov, Ukraine, at November 28–29, 2021. ISBN: 978-3-030-94259-5 (eBook). URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_64 [in English].
  • 3
    Nechyporuk, M., Pavlikov, V., Ivanović, A., Filipenko, N. (2021) Forensic Science Posibilities Within The Framework Of Criminal Proceedings While Aviation Accidents (Review Article). Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 1(3). 56-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.3.2021.05 [in English].
  • 4
    Bondarenko, O. (2013) Vyklyk osoby za kryminalnym protsesualnym zakonodavstvom Ukrayiny. Visnyk prokuratury. № 12. S. 61–67. [in Ukrainе].
  • 5
    Hapotchenko, H. M. (2012) Aktualni pytannya zastosuvannya osobystoyi poruky za novym Kryminalnym protsesualnym kodeksom Ukrayiny. Aktualni problemy zastosuvannya novoho kryminalnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva Ukrayiny ta tendentsiyi rozvytku kryminalistyky na suchasnomu etapi: materialy Vseukrayins`koyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi (m. Kharkiv, 5 zhovtnya 2012 r.). Kharkiv: KHNUVS. S. 198–204. [in Ukrainе].
  • 6
    Hlovyuk, I. V. (2014) Okremi aspekty dokazuvannya pry zastosuvanni zakhodiv zabezpechennya kryminal`noho provadzhennya slidchym suddeyu. Pravo Ukrayiny. 2014. № 10. Рр. 97–105. [in Ukrainе].
  • 7
    Hroshevyy, YU. & Shylo, O. (2013) Problemni pytannya zastosuvannya KPK Ukrayiny pry obranni zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Yurydychnyy chasopys Natsionalnoyi akademiyi vnutrishnikh sprav. № 11. Р. 216–224. [in Ukrainе].
  • 8
    Drozd, A. V. (2019) Zabezpechennya nedotorkannosti prava vlasnosti v kryminal`nomu provadzhenni: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv. 241 s.
  • 9
    Dubivka, I. V. (2017) Diyalnist advokata v stadiyi dosudovoho rozsliduvannya: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyiv. 233 р. [in Ukrainе].
  • 10
    Zavtur, V. A. (2017) Osoblyvosti dokazuvannya pry roz·hlyadi ta vyrishenni slidchym suddeyu ta sudom klopotan pro zastosuvannya zakhodiv zabezpechennya kryminalnoho provadzhenня: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Odesa. 225 р. [in Ukrainе].
  • 11
    Zavtur, V. A. (2016) Roz·hlyad ta vyrishennya slidchym suddeyu klopotannya pro vidstoronennya vid posady: pytannya predmeta dokazuvannya. Naukove zabezpechennya dosudovoho rozsliduvannya: problemy teoriyi ta praktyky: zbirnyk tez dopovidey V Vseukr. naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi (m. Kyiv, 8 lypnya 2016 r.). Kyiv: Natsional`na akademiya vnutrishnikh sprav. Рр. 78–80. [in Ukrainе].
  • 12
    Zavtur, V. (2015) Obgruntuvannya ukhval slidchoho suddi pro zastosuvannya zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhlyadi zastavy: analiz problem ta shlyakhy vdoskonalennya. Visnyk prokuratury: zahal`noderzhavne fakhove yurydychne vydannya. № 12. Рр. 87–95. [in Ukrainе].
  • 13
    Korotkyy tlumachnyy slovnyk ukrayinskoyi movy / pid red. D. H. Hrynchyshyna. 2-he vyd., pererob. i dopov. Kyiv: Radyanska shkola, 1988. 320 р. [in Ukrainе].
  • 14
    Kryminalnyy protsesualnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text. [in Ukrainе].
  • 15
    Kryminalnyy protsesualnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: naukovo-praktychnyy komentar: u 2 t. / O. M. Bandurka, YE. M. Blazhivskyy, YE. P. Burdol ta in.; za red. V. YA. Tatsiya. Kharkiv, 2012. T. 1. 768 р. [in Ukrainе].
  • 16
    Kryminalno-protsesualnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: vid 28.12.1960 № 1001-05. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001-05. [in Ukrainе].
  • 17
    Loboyko, L. M. (2012) Reformuvannya kryminalno-protsesualnoho zakonodavstva v Ukrayini (2006–2011 roky): monohrafiya. Kyyiv. CH. 1. Zahal`ni polozhennya i dosudove provadzhennya. 288 р. [in Ukrainе].
  • 18
    Lukashkina, T. V. (2014) Umovy ta pidstavy zastosuvannya zapobizhnykh zakhodiv za chynnym KPK Ukrayiny. Pravove zhyttya suchasnoyi Ukrayiny: materialy Mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi, prysvyachenoyi yuvileyu akademika S. V. Kivalova (m. Odesa, 16–17 travnya 2014 r.). U 2-kh t. T. 1. Рр. 683–686. [in Ukrainе].
  • 19
    Myronenko, O. (2014) Vplyv spetsialnykh umov zastosuvannya ta obstavyn, yaki pry tsomu vrakhovuyut`sя, na obrannya zapobizhnoho zakhodu. Publichne pravo. № 2 (14). Рр. 89–97. [in Ukrainе].
  • 20
    Morotska, N. (2017) Aresht mayna v kryminalnomu provadzhenni: 5 osnovnykh tez. URL: https://legalhub.online/kryminalne-pravo/aresht-majna-v-kryminalnomuprovadzhenni-5-osnovnyh-tez/. [in Ukrainе].
  • 21
    Palyukh, A. I. (2016) Osoblyvosti uchasti prokurora v dokazuvanni obstavyn, yaki obgruntovuyut obrannya okremykh zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Naukovyy visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. № 1. Рр. 324–332. [in Ukrainе].
  • 22
    Pohoretskyy, M. & Mitskan, O. (2019) Standart dokazuvannya «Obgruntovana pidozra»: nepiznanyy fenomen ukrayinskoho kryminal`noho protsesu. Zakon i biznes. № 10. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/print/136819-yak_minimum_5_kriteriiv_obruntovanosti_pidozri_mae_vrahovuva.html. [in Ukrainе].
  • 23
    Postanovlenye Evropeyskoho Suda po pravam cheloveka po delu «Noymayster protyv Avstryy» ot 27.06.1968. URL: http://europeancourt.ru/resheniya-evropejskogosuda-na-russkom-yazyke/nejmajster-protiv-avstrii-neumeister-v-avstriapostanovlenie-evropejskogo-suda/. [in Ukrainе].
  • 24
    Potsiluyko, V. M. (2018) Osoblyvosti vidstoronennya osoby vid posady yak zakhodu zabezpechennya provadzhennya v kryminal`nykh spravakh i spravakh pro administratyvni pravoporushennya. Naukovyy visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava. Vyp. 3. T. 2. Рр. 156–160. [in Ukrainе].
  • 25
    Pro deyaki pytannya poryadku zastosuvannya zapobizhnykh zakhodiv pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannya ta sudovoho provadzhennya vidpovidno do Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrayiny: lyst Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu z roz·hlyadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav vid 04.04.2013 № 511-550/0/4-13. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0511740-13. [in Ukrainе].
  • 26
    Pro zatverdzhennya Metodychnykh rekomendatsiy stosovno sub’yektiv, yaki mayut` pravo na otrymannya informatsiyi z Reyestru prav vlasnosti na nerukhome mayno: Nakaz Ministerstva yustytsiyi vid 23.09.2009 № 525/5. URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v525_323-09. [in Ukrainе].
  • 27
    Pro otsinku mayna, maynovykh prav ta profesiynu otsinochnu diyalnist v Ukrayini: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 12.07.2001 № 2658-III. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2658-14. [in Ukrainе].
  • 28
    Radkevych, V. M. (2018) Diyi zakhysnyka pry zatrymanni osoby za pidozroyu u vchynenni kryminal`noho pravoporushennya. URL: https://unba.org.ua/assets/uploads/legislations/education-materials/diji-zahisnika-pri-zatrimanni-osobiza-pidozroju-u-vchinenni-kriminalnogo-pravoporushennja.pdf. [in Ukrainе].
  • 29
    Rybalko, V. O. (2015) Otsinni ponyattya, vykorystovuvani pry rehlamentatsiyi zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhlyadi osobystoyi poruky. Naukovyy visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriya yurydychna. № 4. S. 239–248. [in Ukrainе].
  • 30
    Rishennya Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny u spravi … (sprava pro harantiyi deputat·s`koyi nedotorkannosti) vid 26.06.2003 № 12-rp/2003. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/v012p710-03. [in Ukrainе].
  • 31
    Skryabyn, A. N. (2014) Étapy deystvyy zashchytnyka pry reshenyy voprosa ob yzbranyy mery presechenyya podozrevaemomu, obvynyaemomu v uholovnom proyzvodstve Ukrayny. Oraldyң Ġylym Zharshysy Seryya: Polytolohyya, Pravo, Ystoryya. № 19 (98). S. 60–68. [in Ukrainе].
  • 32
    Skryabin, O. M. (2017) Zakhysnyk v kryminal`nomu protsesi: normatyvnopravove doslidzhennya: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Zaporizhzhya. 455 р. [in Ukrainе].
  • 33
    Skryabin, O. M. (2014) Uchast` advokata pry vyrishenni pytannya pro obrannya pidozryuvanomu, obvynuvachenomu zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhlyadi trymannya pid vartoyu. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriya: Pravo. № 2 (44). Рр. 143–148. [in Ukrainе].
  • 34
    Smokov, S. (2013) Kryminalno-protsesualni harantiyi pry zastosuvanni zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhlyadi osobystoyi poruky. Pravo Ukrayiny. № 11. Рр. 242–249. [in Ukrainе].
  • 35
    Soldatenko, O. A. (2014) Teoretychni ta praktychni pytannya zatrymannya osoby za chynnym KPK Ukrayiny. Reformuvannya orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav: problemy ta perspektyvy (vitchyznyanyy i zarubizhnyy dosvid): materialy mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi. Dnipropetrovs`k: Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav. Рр. 95–98. [in Ukrainе].
  • 36
    Tatarov, O. YU. (2016) Kaydanky na kameru: tendentsiya do provedennya zatryman bez ukhvaly slidchoho suddi stanovyt zahrozu pravam osob. Zakon i biznes. № 18 (1264). URL: http://zib.com.ua/ua/print/123397-tendenciya_do_provedennya_zatriman_bez_uhvali_slidchogo_sudd.html. [in Ukrainе].
  • 37
    Turkot, M. S. & Yarmysh, N. M. & Koziy, V. V. (2017) Metodychni rekomendatsiyi shchodo uchasti prokurora u sudovomu kryminalnomu provadzhenni pro zlochyny u sferi sluzhbovoyi diyalnosti v sudi pershoyi instantsiyi. Kyyiv. 56 s.
  • 38
    Uzahalnennya sudovoyi praktyky shchodo roz·hlyadu slidchym suddeyu klopotan pro zastosuvannya zakhodiv zabezpechennya kryminal`noho provadzhennya. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0001740-14. [in Ukrainе].
  • 39
    Ukhvala Apelyatsiynoho sudu Odes`koyi oblasti vid 02.06.2015 u spravi № 522/10259/15-k. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/44947498.
  • 40
    Ukhvala slidchoho suddi Prydniprovs`koho rayonnoho sudu m. Cherkasy vid 19.03.2020 u spravi № 711/1967/20 URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88315659. [in Ukrainе].
  • 41
    Ukhvala slidchoho suddi Prydniprovs`koho rayonnoho sudu m. Cherkasy vid 21.03.2016 u spravi № 711/2242/16-k. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56732322. [in Ukrainе].
  • 42
    Farynnyk, V. I. (2014) Vidstoronennya vid posady: kryminalnyy protsesualnyy aspekt. Naukovyy visnyk Natsional`noho universytetu DPS Ukrayiny. Seriya: Ekonomika, Pravo. № 2 (65). Рр. 162–171. [in Ukrainе].
  • 43
    Farynnyk, V. & Mirkovets, D. (2017) Zatrymannya osoby v novomu Kryminalnomu protsesualnomu kodeksi Ukrayiny: okremi pytannya vidpovidnosti mizhnarodnym standartam i praktytsi Yevropeys`koho sudu z prav lyudyny. Pidpryyemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. № 6. Рр. 192–196. [in Ukrainе].
  • 44
    Firman, O. V. (2015) Ponyattya ta pidstavy dlya zastosuvannya zapobizhnykh zakhodiv. Naukovyy visnyk Khersons`koho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya «Yurydychni nauky». Vyp. 2. T. 3. Рр. 122–128. [in Ukrainе].
  • 45
    Fomina, T. H. (2020) Teoretychni ta protsesualni osnovy zastosuvannya zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi. [in Ukrainе].
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.

Full Text

28
PDF
229

How to Cite

[1]
Kucher O. Capabilities Of The Defense Counsel While Pre-Trial Investigation Of Criminal Offenses In The Field Of Official Activities (Review article). Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2022. Т. 5, № 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.5.2022.03.
Copied!
Citation Format
Download / Завантажити