ISSN 2709-099X e-ISSN 2709-1007
Login
Bokarius Logo

National Scientific Center

"Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute"

of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences

Submit Paper
https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.9.2024.10
Article History

Tactic of Involving a Specialist in Interrogation

Olena Makarova

Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Ukraine
ORCID Email

Abstract

The research paper considers the methods of interacting with specialists and analyzes a situation when involvement of specialists in interrogation is required or recommended. The article contains practical advice for law enforcement agencies and investigators on planning and conducting investigative (search) actions in criminal proceedings. The author has analyzed tactical techniques that investigators can apply to utilize specialists and their expertise during interrogations and other actions. Emphasis is placed on how the determining role of specialists can affect decisions and strategies in trial. The author studies potential risks and benefits associated with the involvement of specialists and provides practical guidelines for optimizing this process. The author emphasizes the importance of careful planning and coordination of efforts of all participants in a criminal proceeding in order to obtain the best results in specific expertise use
Keywords: forensic examination criminal case tactic specific expertise specialist interrogation justice evidence investigation proceedings

References

Джерел: 20
  • 1
    Bazhaniuk, V. V. (2023). Pravovi ta orhanizatsiino-taktychni osnovy provedennia ekspertyz u kryminalnomu provadzhenni : dys. d-ra filosofii. Kropyvnytskyi. 256 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 2
    Baranchuk, V. V. (2018). Systema taktychnykh pryiomiv ustanovlennia psykholohichnoho kontaktu pry dopyti : avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.09. Kharkiv. 20 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 3
    Bidniak, H. S. (2018). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan pry rozsliduvanni shakhraistv : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.09. Dnipro. 248 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 4
    Bondarenko O. O. Protsesualnyi status obiznanykh osib ta yikh pravovidnosyny z diznavachem i slidchym u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.09. Kharkiv, 2004. 260 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 5
    Volobuieva, O. O. (2006). Osoblyvosti diialnosti spetsialistiv i sudovykh ekspertiv pid chas dosudovoho slidstva. Kryminalistychnyi visnyk. № 1 (5). 41-46. [in Ukrainian].
  • 6
    Demydova, Ye. Ye. (2013). Taktyka dopytu obiznanykh osib. Kyiv. 232 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 7
    Zaiets, A. P. (2004). Orhanizatsiini problemy sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi expertyzy i kryminalistyky : zb. nauk.-prakt. materialiv. Vyp. 4. Kharkiv, 8-12. [in Ukrainian].
  • 8
    Zakon Ukrainy «Pro sudovu ekspertyzu» vid 25.02.1994 4038-XII URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
  • 9
    Ishchenko, A. V., Marchuk, R. P. (2008). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan u pravookhoronnii praktytsi: stari ta novi problemy. Naukovyi visnyk NAVS Ukrainy. Vyp. 3. Kyiv. 204-211. [in Ukrainian].
  • 10
    Kashpur, A., Sokyran, F. (2021). nepovnolitnoho: kryminalistychna ta psykholohichna kharakterystyka. Yurydychna psykholohiia. № 2 (29). 61-69. [in Ukrainian].
  • 11
    Kovbasa, V. M. (2014). Aktualni pytannia taktychnoho zabezpechennia dopytu nepovnolitnikh. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. № 1. 253-258. [in Ukrainian].
  • 12
    Kopcha, N. V. (2021). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan pid chas provedennia dopytu pid chas rozsliduvannia sluzhbovoho pidroblennia. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. № 6. 101-106. [in Ukrainian].
  • 13
    Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651 –VI // Baza danykh (BD) «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» / Verkhovna Rada (VR) Ukrainy. URL:https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17. [in Ukrainian].
  • 14
    Marchak, V. Ya. (2005). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh psykholohichnykh znan u dosudovomu slidstvi. Chernivtsi. 152 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 15
    Myroshnychenko, Yu. M. (2022). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan pid chas sudovoho rozghliadu kryminalnykh sprav. Kharkiv. 97 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 16
    Mykhailova, I. (2011). Uchast pedahoha (psykholoha) u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: pytannia teorii ta praktyky. Pravo Ukrainy. № 2. 291-298 [in Ukrainian].
  • 17
    Nikitina-Dudkova, H. Yu. (2021). Komparatyvistskyi analiz orhanizatsiino-taktychnykh i psykholohichnykh zasad provedennia slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii z nepovnolitnimy poterpilymy. Yurydychna psykholohiia. № 2 (29). 70-82. [in Ukrainian].
  • 18
    Pasko, O. M., Horoshko, V. V. (2022). Komunikatyvna hotovnist slidchoho yak neobkhidnyi skladnyk dopytu nepovnolitnikh. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys. № 1-2. 273-277 [in Ukrainian].
  • 19
    Protsesualnyi poriadok ta taktychni osoblyvosti zdiisnennia slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii. Kharkiv, 2018. 101 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 20
    Chornous, Yu. M. (2020). Psykholohichni osnovy realizatsii taktychnykh pryiomiv. Yurydychna psykholohiia. № 1 (26). 13–22. [in Ukrainian].
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.

Full Text

69
PDF (Українська)
129

How to Cite

[1]
Makarova O. Tactic of Involving a Specialist in Interrogation. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2024. Т. 9, № 1. С. 136–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.9.2024.10.
Copied!
Citation Format
Download / Завантажити