ISSN 2709-099X e-ISSN 2709-1007
Login
Bokarius Logo

National Scientific Center

"Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute"

of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences

Submit Paper
https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.9.2024.11
Article History

Interference in the Activities of Government Authorities: Peculiarities of Situation

Volodymyr Popov

National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute» Kharkiv, Ukraine
Ukraine
ORCID Email

Abstract

During the investigation of any criminal offense, it is essential to clarify and substantiate key details about the event, such as the location, time, manner, etc. Among these, details regarding the circumstances surrounding criminal offense commission hold particular importance, as they are pivotal in determining the investigative (search) algorithms and procedural actions that need to be taken to ensure the resolution of tactical investigation tasks. The issue of situation during interference in the activities of government authorities is no exception. In light of the above, the Article Purpose is defined as figuring out the place of situation in the activities of government authorities within forensic characterization, determining its inherent components and specific characteristics. The results of scientific research have revealed that circumstances of a criminal offense are an essential element of forensic characterization of criminal offenses related to interference in the activities of government authorities, which includes information regarding the time and place of these.

Keywords: criminal offense interference government authority representative civil servant statesman/stateswoman forensic characterization situation

References

Джерел: 22
  • 1
    Chyzh, A. P. (2023). Metodyka rozsliduvannia umysnoho znyshchennia abo poshkodzhennia maina pratsivnyka pravookhoronnoho orhanu : dys. … d-ra filosofii: 081 Pravo. Vinnytsia. 229 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 2
    Dyntu, V. A. (2016). Obstanovka zlochynu yak dzherelo dokazovoi informatsii. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. №3. S. 146-150. [in Ukrainian].
  • 3
    Husieva, V. O. (2021). Obstavyny, shcho pidliahaiut z’iasuvanniu pid chas rozsliduvannia vtruchannia v diialnist pratsivnyka pravookhoronnoho orhanu. Pravo i bezpeka. № 2 (81). S. 97-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2021.2.12. [in Ukrainian].
  • 4
    Husieva, V. O. (2021). Teoretychni osnovy metodyky rozsliduvannia zlochyniv proty avtorytetu orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady u sferi pravookhoronnoi diialnosti : dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv. 538 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 5
    Knyzhenko, S. O. (2016). Kryminalistycha kharakterystyka zlochyniv, shcho vchyniaiutsia shliakhom nezakonnoho vtruchannia v diialnist sudovykh orhaniv abo protypravnoho vplyvu na uchasnykiv sudochynstva. Pravo i suspilstvo. № 2. Ch. 1. S. 196-200. [in Ukrainian].
  • 6
    Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.04.2001 №2341-III. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi veb-portal. URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14. [in Ukrainian].
  • 7
    Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651- VI. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy: ofitsiinyi veb-portal. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/-4651-17 [in Ukrainian].
  • 8
    Maslova, O. O. (2019). Kryminalno-pravova kharakterystyka obstanovky vchynennia zlochynu: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.08. Kharkiv. 20 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 9
    Maslova, O. O. (2019). Kryminalno-pravova kharakterystyka obstanovky vchynennia zlochynu : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.08. Kharkiv, 174 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 10
    Moroz, V. H. (2014). Poniattia mistsia vchynennia zlochynu yak oznaky ob’iektyvnoi storony zlochynu. Yurydychna nauka. №. 5. S. 122-136. [in Ukrainian].
  • 11
    Oderii, O. V. (2013). Obstanovka vchynennia zlochynu yak element kryminalistychnoi kharakterystyky zlochyniv proty dovkillia. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu Seriia: Pravo. T. 3. Vyp. 23. Ch. 2. S. 94-98. [in Ukrainian].
  • 12
    Posashkov, O. O. (2017). Teoretychni peredumovy formuvannia kryminalistychnoi kharakterystyky vtruchan v diialnist sudovoho eksperta. Yurydychnyi visnyk. Vyp. 1 (16). T. 4. S. 303-306. [in Ukrainian].
  • 13
    Shepitko, V. Yu., Konovalova, V. O., Zhuravel, V. A. (2016). Kryminalistyka : pidruchnyk / Za red. V.Yu. Shepitka. Kyiv : In Yure. 640 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 14
    Shepitko, V. Yu., Konovalova, V. O., Zhuravel, V. A. ta in. (2010). Kryminalistyka: Pidruchnyk / Za red. prof. V. Yu. Shepitka. 4-e vyd., pererob. i dop. Kharkiv: Pravo. 464 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 15
    Taranenko, V. (2020). Zastupnyk Venediktovoi reanimuvav skandalnu spravu proty suddiv Konstytutsiinoho sudu. Hlavkom: novyny. URL: https://glavcom.ua/news/pislya-znesennya-ks-antikorupciynogo-zakonodavstvazastupnik-venediktovoji-reanimuvav-kriminalnu-spravu-zakritu-u-kvitni-2020-roku-773919.html. [in Ukrainian].
  • 16
    Tishchenko, V. V. (2002). Koryslyvo-nasylnytski zlochyny: kryminalistychnyi analiz : monohrafiia. Odesa : Yuryd. literatura. 360 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 17
    Vtruchannia advokata v diialnist suddi: Vyshcha rada pravosuddia zvernetsia do HPU. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/ukraine/141773-vtruchannya-advokata-vdiyalnist-suddi-vrp-zvernetsya-do-gpu. [in Ukrainian].
  • 18
    Vyrok Bohuslavskoho raionnoho sudu Kyivskoi oblasti vid 20.12.2016 u spravi №1-kp/358/94/16. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: ofitsiinyi sait. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/63523195. [in Ukrainian].
  • 19
    Vyrok Yuzhnoukrainskoho miskoho sudu Mykolaivskoi oblasti vid 13 hrudnia 2021 r. u spravi №486/99/18. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen: ofitsiinyi sait. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/101843031. [in Ukrainian].
  • 20
    Vyshcha rada pravosuddia vymahaie vid HPU rozsliduvannia zlochynu za faktom vtruchannia v diialnist suddi Verkhovnoho Sudu Machulskoho H. M. URL: https://www.yurfact.com.ua/fakty/vrp-vymahaie-rozsliduvannia-zlochynu-za-faktom-vtruchannia-v-diialnistmachulskoho#google_vignette. [in Ukrainian].
  • 21
    Vyshcha rada pravosuddiarozghlianula povidomlennia suddiv apeliatsiinoho sudu shchodo vtruchannia v yikhniu diialnist. URL: https://court.gov.ua/archive/694534/. [in Ukrainian].
  • 22
    Yakovleva, V. S. (2020). Vtruchannia u diialnist sudovykh orhaniv v Ukraini: otsinka suchasnoho stanu. Pytannia borotby zi zlochynnistiu. № 40. S. 126-131. [in Ukrainian].
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.
Preview Article

Full Text

77
PDF (Українська)
43

How to Cite

[1]
Popov V. Interference in the Activities of Government Authorities: Peculiarities of Situation. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2024. Т. 9, № 1. С. 147–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.9.2024.11.
Copied!
Citation Format
Download / Завантажити