Formation of Inner Conviction when Evaluating an Expert Conclusion as a Source of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings by the Judge
Abstract
The article analyzes conceptual bases of specific expertise use during evaluation of evidence in a case by the judge. Formation of internal conviction while the judge’s evaluation of an expert conclusion is connected with a number of challenges, among which the most significant one is the lack of specific expertise in a judge for a comprehensive and objective evaluation of such a conclusion. The research paper analyzes the process of court evaluation of the expert conclusion as evidence in criminal proceedings “on the basis of internal conviction” as well as identifies challenges faced by a judge in the course of such evaluation and analyzes methods for overcoming doubts during evaluation of an expert conclusion and judicial practice concerning the use by judges of means of clarification of the expert conclusion. Own vision of more efficient methods for overcoming doubts by the judge while expert conclusion evaluation is outlined.
Keywords:
judicial system of Ukraine
specific expertise
evidence evaluation
forensic experts
expert conclusion
References
Джерел:
22
References
Джерел: 22-
1
Chernovsʹkyy, O. K. (2009) Psykholohichna osoblyvistʹ suddivsʹkoyi diyalʹnosti. Borotʹba z orhanizovanoyu zlochynnistyu i koruptsiyeyu (teoriya i praktyka). Vyp. 20. S. 147-151 . [in Ukrainian] .
-
2
Drozdovych, N. L. (2010) Vnutrishnye perekonannya suddi yak element pryntsypu vilʹnoyi otsinky dokaziv. Chasopys Kyyivsʹkoho un-tu prava. № 1. S. 250-258 . [in Ukrainian].
-
3
Hroshevoy, YU. M. (1975) Problemy formyrovanyya sudeyskoho ubezhdenyya v uholovnom sudoproyzvodstve. Kharkіv : «Vyshcha shkola», 1975. 144 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
4
Instruktsiya pro pryznachennya ta provedennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ, zatverdzhena Nakazom Ministerstva Yustytsiyi Ukrayiny (v red. nakazu vid 26 hrudnya 2012 roku № 1950/5). Verkhovna rada Ukrayiny: veb-sayt. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
5
Kryminalʹnyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 13 kvit. 2012r. № 4651- VI. Verkhovna rada Ukrayiny: veb-sayt. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651- 17#n2987 [in Ukrainian].
-
6
Kryminalʹnyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 28 hrud. 1960 r. № 1001- 05. Verkhovna rada Ukrayiny: veb-sayt. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001- 05#o28 [in Ukrainian].
-
7
Marchak, V. YA. (2013) Ponyattya ta yurydyko-psykholohichni osoblyvosti formuvannya vnutrishnʹoho perekonannya suddi. Yevropeysʹki perspektyvy. 2013. № 5. S. 83–88. [in Ukrainian].
-
8
Melekh, L. V. (2015) Otsinka dokaziv yak zaklyuchnyy etap protsesu dokazuvannya. Visnyk Luhansʹkoho derzh-ho un-tu vnutrishnikh sprav imeni E. O. Didorenka. 1, 2015. Problemy teoriyi ta praktyky zastosuvannya zakonodavstva, Rozdil 2. [in Ukrainian].
-
9
Melenevsʹka, Z. S. & Sadchenko, O. O. (2011) Otsinochna diyalʹnistʹ eksperta-pocherkoznavtsya yak osnovnyy komponent diyalʹnosti sudovoho eksperta. Kryminalistychnyy visnyk. № 2 (16). S. 58–66. [in Ukrainian]. Ministerstvo yustytsiyi Ukrayiny: veb-sayt. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/m/2-kvartal-2022- roku [in Ukrainian] .
-
10
Ministerstvo yustytsiyi Ukrayiny: veb-sayt. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/m/2-kvartal-2021- roku [in Ukrainian].
-
11
Nechyporuk, M., Pavlikov, V., Ivanović, A., Filipenko, N. (2021) Forensic Science Posibilities Within The Framework Of Criminal Proceedings While Aviation Accidents (Review Article). Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 1(3). 56-66. DOI: https://doi. org/10.32353/acfs.6.2022.05 .
-
12
Polyakova, O. P. (2012) Yssledovanye y otsenka advokatom ékspertnoho zaklyuchenyya. Kryminalistychnyy visnyk. № 2 (18). S. 137–145. [in Ukrainian].
-
13
Postanova Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 07.05.2019 u spravi №398/381/16-k (provadzhennya № 51-6258 km 18). Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ: veb-sayt. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81722349 [in Ukrainian].
-
14
Postanova Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 26.04.2018 u spravi №135/1530/16-k (provadzhennya № 51-447 km 17). Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ: veb-sayt. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73758522 [in Ukrainian].
-
15
Postanova Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 14.11.2019 u spravi №236/3420/15-k (provadzhennya № 51 - 3201 km 19) Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ: veb-sayt. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85678674 [in Ukrainian].
-
16
Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 30.05.1997 №8 «Pro sudovu ekspertyzu v kryminalʹnykh i tsyvilʹnykh spravakh». Verkhovna rada Ukrayiny: veb-sayt. https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0008700-97#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
17
Postanova apelyatsiynoho sudu Chernihivsʹkoyi oblasti vid 26.09.2017 u spravi №750/92/16- k (provadzhennya № 11-kp/795/23/2017) . Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ: veb-sayt. URL:https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/69266032 [in Ukrainian].
-
18
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2015) Provedennya ta vykorystannya sudovykh ekspertyz u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni: monohrafiya. Kharkiv: V dele, 2015. 560 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
19
Shepitko, V. (2004) Psykholohiya sudovoyi diyalʹnosti: problemy teoriyi ta praktyky. Visnyk Akademiyi pravovykh nauk Ukrayiny. 2004 r. № 3(38). Kharkiv : Pravo. S. 161–169. [in Ukrainian].
-
20
Ukhvala Dniprovsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu m.Kyyeva vid 16.08.2022 u spravi №755/9185/19 (provadzhennya № 1-kp/755/190/22) . Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ: vebsayt. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105799519 Ukhvala Poltavsʹkoho apelyatsiynoho sudu vid 01.06.2022 u spravi №554/18239/14-k (provadzhennya № 11-kp/814/96/22).
-
21
Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ: vebsayt. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104638691
-
22
Vapnyarchuk, V. V. (2015) Sutnistʹ vnutrishnʹoho perekonannya v kryminalʹnomu protsesualʹnomu dokazuvanni. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorodsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. Seriya : Pravo. Vyp. 31(3). S. 80–81.
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative
Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.
Full Text
1235
221
How to Cite
[1]
Filipenko N., Barbash D. Formation of Inner Conviction when Evaluating an Expert Conclusion as a Source of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings by the Judge. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2022. Т. 6, № 2. С. 85–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.6.2022.07.
Copied!