Criminological Research On Modern Vandalism In Ukraine

Karyna Salaieva

National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Ukraine

Serhii Lukashevych

National Aerospace University «Kharkiv Aviation Institute», Kharkiv, Ukraine
Ukraine

Abstract

Summary. The article is devoted to the study of modern vandalism in Ukraine from the point of view of criminology. Both official statistical information and the results of the authors’ own research were analysed. It has been proven that modern vandalism in Ukraine should be criminalized and its characteristics included in the Criminal Code as aggravating circumstances. The researchers came to a general conclusion about the need for further study of the problem described. The objective of the article is to study crimes related to vandalism as an object of criminological analysis. At the same time, a number of scientific tasks were solved: the question of the essence of vandalism as a manifestation of illegal aggressive behavior was clarified; the determinants of modern vandalism are separate; the genesis of vandalism-related crimes has been investigated, their causes and conditions have been determined, etc. Research methods. The methodological basis of the work is the dialectical method, the application of which allows you to study the object and subject of research in their epistemological unity, their interrelation, as well as the differences in vandalism as a manifestation of aggressive behavior illegal. Using the historical method, historical and general theoretical questions of the essence of vandalism have been clarified. Using the methods of analysis and synthesis, the types of modern vandalism are separated. This was also facilitated by the use of the structural and functional method which was applied at the same level as the classification and grouping methods in the criminological analysis of crimes related to vandalism and the determination of their latency. The methods specified also made it possible to investigate the genesis of crimes related to vandalism, to determine their causes and conditions and to submit the personality of the criminal-vandal to a criminological analysis. The logical and semantic method was used to provide its own definition of vandalism. Concrete sociological and statistical methods of collecting and analyzing empirical material were also applied, questionnaires of scientific, scientific-pedagogical and practical workers regarding the latency of crimes related to vandalism and the study of documents.

Keywords: modern vandalism criminological analysis crime prevention responsibility for vandalism

References

Джерел: 37
  • 1
    Canter D. Vandalism: overview and prospect. Vandalism. Behaviour and motivations / ed. C. Levy-Leboyer. New York : Elsevier Science Publishers, 1984. 690 р
  • 2
    Cohen S. Vandalism. Destruction of property: motives and meanings. / Ed. by C. Ward. London, 1973. P. 22–53.
  • 3
    Ofis Heneralnoho prokurora Ukraïny. Statystychna informatsiia. URL: https://www. gp.gov.ua/ua/1stat [in Ukrainian]
  • 4
    Koronovirusna ta postkoronovirusna zlochynnist: pervisni karantynni prypushchennia. URL: https://lexinform.com.ua/dumka-eksperta/koronavirusna-ta-postkoronavirusna-zlochynnist-pervisni-karantynni-prypushhennya/ [in Ukrainian]
  • 5
    Aliev H. K. Vandalizm: vozniknovenie, sushhnost i raznovidnosti. Sovremennoe pravo. 2011. № 5. S. 141-145.
  • 6
    Aliev H. K. Vandalizm: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy (po materialam Severo-Kavkazskogo federalnogo okruga) : dis. … kand. yur. nauk 12.00.08 / Federalnoe gosudarstvennoe byudzhetnoe obrazovatelnoe uchrezhdenie vysshego obrazovaniya «Vserossijskij gosudarstvennyj universitet yusticii (RPA Minyusta Rossii)». Moskva, 2015. 217 s.
  • 7
    Andrushko A. V., Nesterova I. A. Zlochynnist u sferi turystychnoho biznesu: kryminolohichna kharakterystyka ta zapobihannia : monohrafiia. Uzhhorod : TOV «IVA», 2016. 220 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 8
    Bandurka A. M., A. F. Zelynskyi. Vandalyzm : nauchnoe yzdanye. Kharkov : Un-t vnutr. sprav, 1996. 199 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 9
    Bocharova K. A. Ahresiia yak dominanta povedinky zlochyntsia-vandala. Kryminolohichna teoriia i praktyka: dosvid, problemy sohodennia ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia: materialy nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 25 berez. 2016 r.): u 2 ch. Kyiv : Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav, 2016. Ch. 2. S. 186-191. [in Ukrainian]
  • 10
    Bocharova K.A. Zapobihannia zlochynam, poviazanym z vandalizmom: monohrafiia/ za zah. red. S. Yu. Lukashevycha. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2019. 216 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 11
    Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (z dod. i dop.) /uklad. i holov. red. V. T. Busel. Kyiv: Irpin : VTF «Perun», 2005. 1728 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 12
    Veprytskyi R. S. Latentnist zlochynnosti ta shliakhy yii podolannia. Forum prava. 2014. №1. S. 72-74. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/FP_index.htm_2014_1_14.pdf (дата звернення: 20.09.2017). [in Ukrainian]
  • 13
    Vovchyk-Blakytna O. O. Sposib zhyttia simi yak determinanta rozvytku dytyny. Naukovyi visnyk MNU im. V. O. Sukhomlinskoho. Seriia psykholohichni nauky. 2013. Tom 2. №10 (91). S. 69-74. [in Ukrainian]
  • 14
    Gladush G. V. Proyavlenie agressivnosti u podrostkov v situaciyah frustracii. Psihologiya i pedagogika: metody i problemy prakticheskogo primeneniya. 2014. № 39. S. 31-39.
  • 15
    Holovkin B. M. Zahalna kharakterystyka determinatsii zlochynnosti v Ukraini. Forum prava. 2014. №1. S. 106-111. [in Ukrainian]
  • 16
    Holovkin B. M. Prychynnist v systemi determinatsii zlochynnosti. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva. 2014. Vyp. 1(5). C. 1-9. [in Ukrainian]
  • 17
    Holovkin B. M. Ya-kontseptsiia osobystosti koryslyvoho nasylnytskoho zlochyntsia. Problemy zakonnosti. Kharkiv, 2010. Vyp. 107. S. 143-153. [in Ukrainian]
  • 18
    Donchenko A. Nenakazuemyj vandalizm? Rossijskaya yusticiya. 1998. № 6. S. 22
  • 19
    Egorov V. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za prestupleniya protiv obshhestvennoĭ bezopasnosti i obshhestvennogo poryadka : uch. posobie. Moskva : MPSI; Voronezh: Izdatelstvo NPO «MODJeK», 2000. 64 s.
  • 20
    Zakaliuk A.P. Kurs suchasnoi ukrainskoi kryminolohii: teoriia i praktyka: u 3 kn. Kyiv: In Yure, 2007. Kn. 1: Teoretychni zasady ta istoriia ukrainskoi kryminolohichnoi nauky. 424 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 21
    Zelinskyy̆ A. F. Kryminalna motyvatsiia rozkradan ta inshoï koryslyvoï zlochynnoï diialnosti : navch. posibnyk. Kyïv : NMK VO, 1991. 70 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 22
    Igoshev K. E. Tipologiya lichnosti prestupnika i motivaciya prestupnogo povedeniya. Gorkij : Izd-vo GVSH MVD SSSR, 1974. 168 s.
  • 23
    Ilyashenko A. N. Socialnaya sreda v genezise prestupnogo povedeniya (osobennosti kriminalizacii nesovershennoletnih pod vliyaniem socialnoĭ mikrosredy). Moskva : VNII MVD Rossii, 2001. 317 s.
  • 24
    Komentar do statti 113. Dyversiia. URL: http://yurist-online.com/ukr/uslugi/yuristam/ kodeks/024/111.php (data zvernennia: 20.06.2017). [in Ukrainian]
  • 25
    Komentar do statti 194. Umysne znyshchennia abo poshkodzhennia maina. URL: http:// yurist-online.com/ukr/uslugi/yuristam/kodeks/024/191.php (data zvernennia: 20.06.2017). [in Ukrainian
  • 26
    Kochetkova S. V. Opyt analiza nasiliya v seme. Sociologicheskoe issledovanie. 1999. № 12. S. 114-117.
  • 27
    Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy: Osoblyva chastyna: pidruchnyk / Yu. V. Baulin, V. I. Borysov, V. I. Tiutiuhin ta in.; za red. prof. V. Ya. Tatsiia, V. I. Borysova, V. I. Tiutiuhina. 5-e vyd., pererobl. i dopov. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2015. 680 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 28
    Kryminolohiia: pidruchnyk / V. V. Holina, B. M. Holovkin, M. Yu. Valuiska ta in.; za red. V. V. Holiny, B. M. Holovkina. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2014. 440 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 29
    Leontieva L. Ye. Informatsiini determinanty v politychnykh protsesakh. Derzhava i pravo. Yurydychni i politychni nauky. Kyiv, 2005. Vyp. 29. S. 573-578. 15 [in Ukrainian]
  • 30
    Luneev V. V. Motivaciya prestupnogo povedeniya. Moskva : Nauka, 1991. 382 s.
  • 31
    Marshuba M. O. O vandalizme i borbe s nim. Aktualnye problemy stanovleniya gosudarstvennosti v Ukraine: kratkie tez. dokl. i nauch. soobshhenij mezhregion. nauch. konf. molodyh uchenyh i soiskatelej. Harkov, 1995. S. 47-48.
  • 32
    Nerivnist v Ukraini: masshtaby ta mozhlyvosti vplyvu / red. E. M. Libanovoi. Kyiv: Instytut demohrafii ta sotsialnykh doslidzhen imeni M. V. Ptukhy NAN Ukrainy, 2012. 404 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 33
    Paskhaver O. Y., Verkhovodova L. T., Aheieva K. M.. Svitovyi dosvid dlia Ukrainy: vzaiemovidnosyny velykoho kapitalu z vladoiu i suspilstvom. Kyiv : «Dukh i literatura», 2007. 130 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 34
    Pyvovarov V. V., Melnychuk L. O. Rol konkretnoi zhyttievoi sytuatsii u mekhanizmi vchynennia zlochynu. Karpatskyi pravnychyi chasopys. 2015. №10. S. 72-78. [in Ukrainian]
  • 35
    Popova H. V. Henderni osoblyvosti perezhyvan zasudzhenykh za vbyvstvo shchodo skoienoho nymy zlochynu ta korektsiina prohrama roboty z emotsinoiu sferoiu osobystosti zlochyntsiv nasylnytskoho typu. Pravo i bezpeka. 2006. Vyp. 4 (№ 5/4). S. 186-190. [in Ukrainian]
  • 36
    Saharov A. B. O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinah prestupnosti v SSSR. Moskva : YUrid. lit., 1961. 278 s.
  • 37
    Shakun V. I. Urbanizatsiia i zlochynnist: monohrafiia. Kyïv: Vydavnytstvo Ukraïnskoï Akademiï vnutrishnikh sprav, 1996. 256 s. [in Ukrainian]
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.

Full Text

310
337

How to Cite

[1]
Salaieva K., Lukashevych S. Criminological Research On Modern Vandalism In Ukraine. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2022. Т. 6, № 2. С. 119–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.6.2022.10.
Copied!