The Place Of Systematic Approach In The Formation Of Methodological Principles Of Forensic Engineering And Technical Examinations

Ihor Bohdaniuk

National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute» of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Ukraine

Abstract

The analysis of scientific works made it possible to come to the conclusion that the scholars have created a fundamental basis for the methodology of forensic examination which is the basis for the formation of the methodological foundations of forensic engineering and technical examination for its further theoretical and practical development. This research paper identifies the place of the system approach in the formation of general principles of the methodology of forensic engineering and technical examinations. It has been established that the methodology can be formulated as a philosophical doctrine on the system of proven principles, norms and methods of scientific and cognitive activity, about forms, structure and functions of scientific knowledge, which are used in solving specific (special) research issues. It is emphasized that three levels are distinguished in the structure of general scientific methods: empirical methods, logical methods and techniques, heuristic methods, a detailed description of the methods of each level is given, and successive stages of experimental research are formed. It has been established that methodology is an independent scientific direction that studies the process of carrying out scientific research, describes and analyzes the stages of research and studies a number of other issues. This article’s purpose is to determine the place of the system approach in the formation of the general principles of the methodology of conducting forensic engineering and technical examinations which will allow the expert to obtain scientifically based results for drawing up a reliable conclusion. Conclusions. It is determined that the system is a whole, complex, unity (integrity) that consists (combines) of many elements connected with each other in which the element is the smallest part of the whole, necessary for the description of the system which cannot be divided further. The unity of general scientific and philosophical levels of knowledge is the basis of the methodology of scientific and cognitive activity, about forms, structure and functions of scientific knowledge. The methodology is proposed to be understood first of all as the methodology of scientific knowledge which is a set of theoretical provisions on the principles of construction, forms and methods of scientific and cognitive activity, in addition, it can be considered as a certain system of fundamental ideas. It is proven that methodology is distinguished as a separate scientific direction that studies the process of carrying out scientific research, describes and analyzes the stages of research and studies a number of other issues.

Keywords: system system approach levels of knowledge science methodology methods techniques forensic engineering and technical examinations principles of the methodology of conducting forensic engineering and technical examinations

References

Джерел: 18
  • 1
    web-entsyklopediia «Vikipediia» Internet-resurs URL: https://uk.wikipedia.org/ wiki/%D0%95%D0%BA%D1%81% D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0% B5%D0%BD%D1%82
  • 2
    Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (z dod. i dopov.) Uklad. i holov. red. Busel V.T. K.: Irpin VTF «Perun», 2005. S. 672. [in Ukrainian].
  • 3
    Hutorov O. I. Metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen : navch. posibn Kharkiv: KhNAU, 2017. 272 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 4
    Danylian O. H., Dzoban O. P. Orhanizatsiia ta metodolohiia naukovykh doslidzhen : navch. posib. Kharkiv. Pravo, 2017. 448 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 5
    Dzhavadov F. M. Kontseptualni osnovy rozvytku sudovoi ekspertyzy v suchasnykh umovakh : avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk. Kyiv. 2000. 29 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 6
    Instruktsiia pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen, zatverdzhena nakazom Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy vid 08.10.1998 № 53/5 (zi zminamy ta dopovnenniamy) Chynna z 03.11.1998. Internet-resurs URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text [in Ukrainian].
  • 7
    Kachan N.S. Vzaiemozviazok systemy i struktury: filosofsko-ekonomichnyi aspekt. Naukovi pratsi Kirovohradskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, vyp. 17 Kirovohrad: KNTU, 2010. S. 77-83. [in Ukrainian].
  • 8
    Krushelnytska O. V. Metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen : navch. posibn. Kyiv. Kondor, 2003. 192 s. [in Ukrainian]
  • 9
    Navchalnyi ekonomichnyi slovnyk-dovidnyk (politekonomiia, mikroekonomika, makroekonomika, ekonomichnyi analiz, ekonomika pidpryiemstva, menedzhment, marketynh, finansy, banky, investytsii, birzhova diialnist): Terminy, poniattia, personalii. / Za nauk. red. H. I. Bashnianyna i V. S. Iftemchuka. 2-he vydannia, vypravlene i dopovnene. Lviv: Mahnoliia 2006, 2007. S. 361.
  • 10
    Osnovy sudovoi ekspertyzy: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia fakhivtsiv, yaki maiut namir otrymaty abo pidtverdyty kvalifikatsiiu sudovoho eksperta / avt.-uklad.: L. M. Holovchenko, A. I. Lozovyi, E. B. Simakova-Yefremian ta in. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2016. S. 26. [in Ukrainian].
  • 11
    Pyrih I. V. P Teoretyko-prykladni problemy ekspertnoho zabezpechennia dosudovoho rozsliduvannia : monohrafiia. Dnipropetrovsk : Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav ; Lira LTD, 2015. 432 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 12
    Rohalin S. V. Zastosuvannia metodu modeliuvannia v doslidnytskii praktytsi sudovykh ekspertyz. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Vyp.19. Kharkiv: Pravo. 2019. S. 212–225. [in Ukrainian].
  • 13
    Simakova-Yefremian E. B. Kompleksni sudovo-ekspertni doslidzhennia: teoriia ta praktyka : monohrafiia. Kharkiv. Pravo. 2016. 456 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 14
    Uzakov, O. Kh., Mukhydova, O. N. Nauchnыe yssledovanyia: osnovы metodolohyy. Science and Education. 2021. 2 (12). P. 376–386. URL: https://openscience.uz/index. php/sciedu/article/view/2180 [in Ukrainian].
  • 15
    Filosofskyi slovnyk sotsialnykh terminiv. Vydannia tretie, dopovnene. Kharkiv. R.Y.F.”, 2005. 672 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 16
    Chernousenko O. Yu., Chepeliuk O. O., Ryndiuk D. V. Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen ta inzhenernoi tvorchosti : navch. posibn. Kyiv. KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho, 2016. 270 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 17
    Sheiko V. M., Kushnarenko N. M. Orhanizatsiia a metodyka naukovo-doslidnytskoi diialnosti. Kyiv. Znannia, 2004. 307 c. [in Ukrainian].
  • 18
    Shcherbakovskyi M. H. Provedennia ta vykorystannia sudovykh ekspertyz u kryminalnomu provadzhenni : monohrafiia. Kharkiv : V dele, 2015. 560 s. [in Ukrainian].
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.

Full Text

1176
254

How to Cite

[1]
Bohdaniuk I. The Place Of Systematic Approach In The Formation Of Methodological Principles Of Forensic Engineering And Technical Examinations. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2022. Т. 6, № 2. С. 158–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.6.2022.14.
Copied!