Use Of Special Knowledge During The Investigation Of Knowingly False Testimony Of The Witness And The Victim
Abstract
Fair and objective justice requires compliance by all its participants with legally established principles. At the same time, in law enforcement practice there are cases of falsification of evidence, which is caused by various circumstances, and motivational factors that are guided by the participants in the process, in particular, the witness and the victim. That is why similar acts are criminalized, and the scientific community has an updated task to develop substantiated recommendations for improving the quality of investigations of similar facts. Taking into account the significant importance of special knowledge in similar criminal proceedings, which is evidenced by the analysis of court practice, the purpose of the article is defined as the clarification of typical forms of special knowledge used during the pre-trial investigation of knowingly false statements by witnesses and victims, the specifics of their implementation. Based on the results of the research, it was determined that the appointment of a forensic handwriting examination, a forensic psychiatric examination, a forensic psychological examination, in particular with the use of a polygraph, a forensic telecommunications examination, and less often a technical examination of a document is typical. Each of the outlined forensic examinations has its specifics that need to be considered. Prospects for further scientific research are outlined.
References
Джерел:
33
References
Джерел: 33-
1
Hora, I. V., Kolesnyk, B. A. (2012). Slidchyy eksperyment chy perevirka pokazanʹ osoby? Visnyk Luhansʹkoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav imeni E.O. Didorenka. №. 3. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/ cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_ DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Vlduvs_2012_3_29.pdf [in Ukrainian].
-
2
Korobka, O. S. (2020). Dopyt u konfliktniy slidchiy sytuatsiyi. Yurydychnyy naukovyy elektronnyy zhurnal. №2. DOI: 10.32782/2524-0374/2020-2/99 [in Ukrainian].
-
3
Protsenko, O. O. (2019). Veryfikatsiya pokazanʹ pid chas dopytu nepovnolitnʹoho pidozryuvanoho. Yurydychna psykholohiya. T. 25. №. 2. DOI: 10.33270/03192502.86 [in Ukrainian].
-
4
Tsilʹmak, O. M. (2022). Faktory neusvidomlenoho vykryvlennya osoboyu pokazanʹ. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. №67. S. 658-671. DOI: 10.33994/kndise.2022.67.66 [in Ukrainian].
-
5
Nanivsʹkyy, V., Leshkovych, T. (2014). Perspektyvy vykorystannya polihrafa u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni. Visnyk Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi prokuratury Ukrayiny. №. 1. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/ cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_ DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Vnapu_2014_1_7.pdf [in Ukrainian].
-
6
Tsymbal, P. V., Lynnyk, O. V., Bordachova, YA. M. (2017). Perspektyvy vykorystannya tekhnichnykh zasobiv vyyavlennya nepravdyvoyi informatsiyi pry rozsliduvanni kryminalʹnykh pravoporushenʹ. Mizhnarodnyy yurydychnyy visnyk: aktualʹni problemy suchasnosti (teoriya ta praktyka). № 4-5 (8-9). URL: https://journals.dpu. kyiv.ua/index.php/law/article/view/24 [in Ukrainian].
-
7
Vuima, A. H. (2021). Zastosuvannya polihrafu yak neprotsesualʹna forma vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ pid chas rozsliduvannya vbyvstv. Rozvytok nauky ta tekhniky: problemy i perspektyvy: mater. mizhnar. nauk-prakt. internet-konf. z nahody vidznachennya Dnya nauky-2021 v Ukrayini (m. Kyyiv, 20 travnya 2021 r.). Kyyiv, Derzhavnyy naukovo-doslidnyy instytut MVS Ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].
-
8
Shevchuk, V. M. (2021). Innovatsiyni napryamy optymizatsiyi slidchoyi (detektyvnoyi) diyalʹnosti u suchasnykh umovakh. Teoriya ta praktyka sudovoyi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. № 2 (24). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.2.2021.02 [in Ukrainian].
-
9
Boiarov V., Larkin M., Dudorov O., Pyrozhkova Y., Legkykh K. (2020). Interrogation of the victims during the investigation of crimes committed by youth extremist groups. Amazonia Investiga. № 9 (28). DOI: 10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.31 [in Ukrainian].
-
10
Robert A. Nash, Maciej Hanczakowski, Giuliana Mazzoni. (2015). Eyewitness Testimony. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.51033-2 [in Ukrainian].
-
11
Sprava «Dorson proty Niderlandiv» (Doorson v. the Netherlands): Rishennya Yevropeysʹkoho sudu z prav lyudyny vid 26.03.1996. URL: https://www.hr-dp. org/contents/545 [in Ukrainian].
-
12
Sprava «Kornyev i Karpenko proty Ukrayiny»: Rishennya Yevropeysʹkoho sudu z prav lyudyny (P`yata sektsiya) vid 21.10.2010. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/974_637#Text. [in Ukrainian].
-
13
Tsyvilʹnyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/1618-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
14
Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ main/2747-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
15
Hospodarsʹkyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/main/2747-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
16
Zolota, L. V., Savchenko, I. O. (2022). Problematyka pryznachennya pocherkoznavchoyi ekspertyzy v tsyvilʹnomu sudochynstvi. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorodsʹkoho Natsionalʹnoho Universytetu. Seriya Pravo. №70. DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2022.70.25 [in Ukrainian].
-
17
Vyrok Novohrad-Volynsʹkoho misʹkrayonnoho sudu Zhytomyrsʹkoyi oblasti vid 07.09.2022 r., u spravi № 285/350/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/106109925 [in Ukrainian].
-
18
Vyrok Khotynsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu Chernivetsʹkoyi oblasti vid 09.12.2019 r., u spravi №724/1089/19. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86193275 [in Ukrainian]
-
19
Vyrok Shepetivsʹkoho misʹkrayonnlshl sudu Khmelʹnytsʹkoyi oblasti vid 13.07.2022 r., u spravi №688/1606/22. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105248657 [in Ukrainian].
-
20
Vyrok Trostyanetsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu Sumsʹkoyi oblasti vid 15.02.2016 r., u spravi №588/1810/15-k. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/55748276 [in Ukrainian].
-
21
Vyrok Krasnohvardiysʹkoho rayonnoho sudu Avtonomnoyi Respubliky Krym vid 02.09.2013 r., u spravi №109/3113/2013-k. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/33228255 [in Ukrainian].
-
22
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro psykhiatrychnu dopomohu». Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady.: 2000. № 1489-III. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1489-14#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
23
Husieva, V., Oderiy, O., Petrova, I., Fomina, T., Vuima A. (2021). Features of the investigation of premeditated murders committed by persons with mental disorders in the practice of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga. № 10 (46). DOI: 10.34069/ AI/2021.46.10.10 [in Ukrainian].
-
24
Vuima, A. H. (2023). Vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ pid chas rozsliduvannya vbyvstva: dys. … dokt. filosofiyi: 081 Pravo. Kharkiv. [in Ukrainian].
-
25
Lozynsʹka, YU. I., Shekhavtsov, R. M. (2020). Dostovirnistʹ pokazanʹ svidka ta yiyi z`yasuvannya u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni: monohrafiya. Lʹviv: Lʹvivsʹkyy derzhavnyy universytet vnutrishnikh sprav [in Ukrainian].
-
26
Vyrok Halytsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu m. Lʹvova vid 12.11.2020 r., u spravi №461/4425/18. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/92848410 [in Ukrainian].
-
27
Vyrok Halytsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu m. Lʹvova vid 07.12.2020 r., u spravi №461/4416/18. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/93388161 [in Ukrainian].
-
28
Vyrok Korolʹovsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu m. Zhytomyra vid 15.07.2020 r., u spravi №283/457/17-k. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90420170 [in Ukrainian].
-
29
Mohilevskyi, L., Husieva, V., Perlin, S., Chycha, R., Shynkarenko, I. (2022). Determinants and methods of diagnosing criminal proceedings participants false testimony in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga. № 11(51). DOI: 10.34069/AI/2022.51.03.7 [in Ukrainian].
-
30
Howgego, J. (2019). The truth about lie detectors. New Scientist. № 242(3231). DOI: 10.1016/ s0262-4079(19)30925-x [in English].
-
31
Street, C. N. H. (2015). Alied: Humans as adaptive lie detectors. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. №4(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.06.002 [in English].
-
32
Instruktsiya pro pryznachennya ta provedennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsiy z pytanʹ pidhotovky ta pryznachennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ: zatv. nakazom Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny vid 08.10.1998 № 53/5 (zi zminamy ta dopovnennyamy). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98 [in Ukrainian].
-
33
Korshenko, V. A. (2017). Teoretychni ta metodychni osnovy sudovoyi telekomunikatsiynoyi ekspertyzy : avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.09. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].