ISSN 2709-099X e-ISSN 2709-1007
Login
Bokarius Logo

National Scientific Center

"Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute"

of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences

Submit Paper
https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.8.2023.11

The Expert Conclusion In The System Of Criminal Procedural Means Of Proof For Crimes Against Law Enforcement Officers

Olha Sharova-Aidaieva

Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs (postgraduate student), Kharkiv, Ukraine
Ukraine
ORCID Email

Abstract

The expert conclusion, which contains definite answers to the questions of the investigator or prosecutor, plays an important role in clarifying those circumstances, the establishment of which requires the use of specific expertise. The Article aims to clarify the peculiarities of involving a forensic expert in investigating crimes committed against law enforcement officers and to determine the place and role of expert conclusions in the system of criminal procedural means of proof for crimes in this category. Through the synthesis of theoretical materials, we identify the typical expert studies during investigations of crimes within the researched group. We also establish the conditions that must be observed to recognize obtained expert conclusions as admissible sources of evidence.

Keywords: criminal proceeding pre-trial investigation forensic examination expert conclusion proof crime law enforcement officer

References

Джерел: 19
  • 1
    Pro zareyestrovani kryminalʹni pravoporushennya ta rezulʹtaty yikh dosudovohorozsliduvannya (2013–2022 rr.). URL: https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/pro-zareyestrovani-kriminalni-pravoporushennya-ta-rezultati-yih-dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya-2 [in Ukrainian].
  • 2
    Husieva, V. O. (2020). Metodyka rozsliduvannya zlochyniv proty avtorytetu orhaniv derzhavnoyi vlady u sferi pravookhoronnoyi diyalʹnosti : monohrafiya. Kharkiv : U spravi [in Ukrainian].
  • 3
    Kobetsʹ S. V. (2023). Rozsliduvannya pohrozy abo nasylʹstva shchodo pratsivnyka pravookhoronnoho orhanu : dys. ... d-ra filosofiyi : 081 Pravo. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 4
    Chyzh, A. P. (2023). Metodyka rozsliduvannya umysnoho znyshchennya abo poshkodzhennya mayna pratsivnyka pravookhoronnoho orhanu : dys. ... d-ra filosofiyi : 081 Pravo. Vinnytsya [in Ukrainian].
  • 5
    Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/-4651-17. [in Ukrainian].
  • 6
    Tyutyunnyk, V. V. (2015). Instytut dopustymosti dokaziv yak harantiya ukhvalennya zakonnoho ta obgruntovanoho vyroku sudu : dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 7
    Vorobchak, A. R. (2019). Vysnovok eksperta yak dzherelo dokaziv u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni : dys. … kand. yury nauk: 12.00.09. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
  • 8
    Kaylo, I. YU. (2016). Dopustymistʹ dokaziv u kryminalʹnomu protsesi Ukrayiny : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 9
    Abramova, V. M. (2004). Ekspertni pomylky: sutnistʹ, henezys, shlyakhy podolannya : avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk. 12.00.09. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 10
    Shcherbakovsʹkyy, M. H., Dementʹyev M. V., Protsenko A. M. (2022). Kryteriyi ta vydy protsesualʹnykh porushenʹ yak pidstavy nedopustymosti vysnovku eksperta. Visnyk Luhansʹkoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav im. E.O. Didorenka. № 3 (99). https://doi.org/10.33766/2524-0323.99.173-186. [in Ukrainian].
  • 11
    Husieva, V. O. (2021). Teoretychni osnovy metodyky rozsliduvannya zlochyniv proty avtorytetu orhaniv derzhavnoyi vlady u sferi pravookhoronnoyi diyalʹnosti : dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 12
    Ohlyad sudovoyi praktyky Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu shchodo vyznannya dokaziv nedopustymymy. Rishennya, vneseni do YEDRSR, za period z 2018 roku po chervenʹ 2021 roku / uporyad. zastupnyk holovy Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu, kand. yuryd. nauk V. V. Shchepotkina, pravove upravlinnya (III) departamentu analitychnoyi ta pravovoyi roboty aparatu Verkhovnoho Sudu. Kyyiv, 2021. 75 s. [in Ukrainian].
  • 13
    Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 25 chervnya 2019 r., u spravi № 423/1766/16 (provadzhennya № 51-1105km19). URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/82769623 [in Ukrainian].
  • 14
    Koropetsʹka, S. O. (2017). Vidibrannya zrazkiv biolohichnoho pokhodzhennya pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannya: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyyiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 15
    Vuima, A. H. (2023). Vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ pid chas rozsliduvannya vbyvstva: dys. … dokt. filosofiyi: 081 Pravo. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 16
    Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 25 chervnya 2019 r., u spravi № 423/1766/16 (provadzhennya № 51-1105km19). URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/82769623 [in Ukrainian].
  • 17
    Ohlyad sudovoyi praktyky Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu shchodo nedopustymosti dokaziv, otrymanykh vnaslidok istotnoho porushennya prav ta svobod lyudyny. Rishennya, vneseni do YERDSR, za period z 2018 roku po zhovtenʹ 2020 roku. Kyyiv, 2020 [in Ukrainian].
  • 18
    Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 16 bereznya 2017 r., u spravi № 5-364ks16. URL: https://sudpraktika.wordpress.com/%D0%BA%D1%80% [in Ukrainian].
  • 19
    Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 12 zhovtnya 2017 r., u spravi № 5-237ks(15)17. URL: https://sudpraktika.wordpress.com/%D0%BA/ [in Ukrainian].
CC BY
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution International license.

Full Text

660
PDF
212

How to Cite

[1]
Sharova-Aidaieva O. The Expert Conclusion In The System Of Criminal Procedural Means Of Proof For Crimes Against Law Enforcement Officers. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 2023. Т. 8, № 2. С. 131–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.8.2023.11.
Copied!
Citation Format
Download / Завантажити