Editorial Cycle
Civil claim in criminal proceedings: conceptual approaches to understanding essence
Abstract
The article is devoted to the issue of compensation for damage caused by a criminal offense by filing a civil claim in criminal proceedings, which is relevant for modern science of criminal procedure. The author draws attention to the fact that fundamental changes in the current criminal procedural and civil legislation necessitate a revision of established approaches not only to the procedural procedure for filing and considering a civil claim in criminal proceedings, but to doctrinal approaches to understanding the essence of the institution of a civil claim, because a typical mistake in scientific research is the use of established legal “clichés” in understanding modern institutions, including the institution of a civil claim in criminal proceedings. Thus, the purpose of the article is to understand the essence of the conceptual changes that have occurred in the regulatory regulation of the institution of a civil claim in criminal proceedings, as a fundamental concept of the doctrinal understanding of the form of considering a civil claim. The author’s approaches are based on general and special methods of scientific research. The logical method was used to examine the concept of “joint process”; the systemic method was used to understand the problem in its comprehensive vision and to form conclusions; the hermeneutic method was useful for interpreting the norms of criminal procedural law. According to the results of the study, a conclusion was made about the inexpediency of understanding a civil claim in criminal proceedings as a joint process, since it cannot be considered as a combination of criminal proceedings and proceedings regarding a civil claim in one proceeding. The procedure for compensation for damage on the basis of a declared civil claim operates within the framework of criminal procedural legal relations, the norms of civil procedural law are auxiliary, as indicated by Part 5 of Article 128 of Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, and therefore it is a single process devoid of contradictions between the two branches of law.
References
Джерел:
22
References
Джерел: 22-
1
Karpenko, Ye. M. (2018). Mizhnarodnyi dosvid vidshkoduvannia shkody poterpilomu yak odna z form zapobihannia zlochynam Ye. M. Karpenko. Pravovyi chasopys Donbasu. № 1. S. 190-196 [in Ukrainian].
-
2
Kakhnych, Kh. R. (2013). Ziednanyi protses yak sposib zakhystu prav poterpiloho vid zlochynu u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk. Lviv. 234 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
3
Kakhnych, Kh. (2013). Chy dorechnyi instytut ziednanoho protsesu (tsyvilnoho pozovu) v kryminalnomu provadzhenni Ukrainy: pro et contra. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Ser. : Yurydychna. Vyp. 57. S. 329-335 [in Ukrainian].
-
4
Komarov, V. V. (2008). Tsyvilne protsesualne pravo: problemy metodolohii nauky, dyferentsiatsii ta unifikatsii sudovykh protsedur // Pravova systema Ukrainy: istoriia, stan ta perspektyvy : u 5 t. T. 3: Tsyvilno-pravovi nauky. Pryvatne pravo. Kharkiv. Pidrozd. 3.6. S. 542–573 [in Ukrainian].
-
5
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy, pryiniata na piatii sesii Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy/ 28 chervnia 1996 roku (redaktsiia vid 01.01.2020 r.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
6
Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy, Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.04.2001 r. URL: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
7
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy, Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text [in Ukrainian].
-
8
Kulyk, O. H. (2017). Zlochynnist yak sotsialne yavyshche: suttievi oznaky ta vyznachennia poniattia. Nauka i pravookhorona. № 1. S. 125-132 [in Ukrainian].
-
9
Mozharovska, K. V. (2010). Yurydychna pryroda tsyvilnoho pozovu u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava. Vyp. 56. S. 172-180 [in Ukrainian].
-
10
Zaprovadzhennia administratyvnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini — podolannia problem rozmezhuvannia yurysdyktsii // Kontseptualni zasady rozvytku vitchyznianoho administratyvnoho prava ta protsesu: tendentsii, perspektyvy, praktyka : kolektyvna monohrafiia /za zah. red. P. Dikhtiievskoho, V. Pashynskoho. Ryha, Latviia : “Baltija Publishing”, 2022. S. 267-287 [in Ukrainian].
-
11
Podkovenko, T. (2023). Zlochynnist yak sotsialne yavyshche ta shliakhy protydii. In: Omul, criminologia, ştiinţa, Ed. Ediția a 2-a, 24 martie, Chişinău. Chişinău: Institutul de științe penale și criminologie aplicată, 2023, Ediția a 2-a, Vol. 1, pp. 205-208. [in Ukrainian].
-
12
Pozovne provadzhennia : monohrafiia / za red. V. V. Komarova. Kh. : Pravo, 2011. 552 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
13
Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv. Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1402-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#n249.
-
14
Snidevych, O. S. (2012). Aktualni pytannia protsesu ta sudovoi praktyky // Visnyk Vyshchoi rady yustytsii. № 2 (10). 41-53 [in Ukrainian].
-
15
Tataryn, I. I. (2017). Vidshkoduvannia shkody poterpilomu, zapodiianoi kryminalnym pravoporushenniam : monohrafiia. Lviv. 184 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
16
Tataryn, I. I. (2015). Zabezpechennia vidshkoduvannia shkody, zapodiianoi kryminalnym pravoporushenniam, na dosudovomu rozsliduvanni : dys…kand.. ur. nauk. 12.00.09. / Lviv. 223 s. [in Ukrainian].
-
17
Tytska,Ya. O. (2021). Pravo na sudovyi zakhyst v systemi prav liudyny: naukovo-teoretychnyi aspekt u suchasnomu kon-teksti. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. № 9. S. 348-351. [in Ukrainian].
-
18
Triasov, D. A. (2023). Tsyvilnyi pozov u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Yevropeiski oriientyry rozvytku Ukrainy v umovakh viiny ta hlobalnykh vyklykiv KhKhI stolittia: synerhiia naukovykh, osvitnikh ta tekhnolohichnykh rishen : u 2 t. : materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Odesa, 19 travnia 2023 r.). Odesa : Vydavnytstvo «Iurydyka». T. 2. S. 373-377. [in Ukrainian].
-
19
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy, Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r. № 435-IV. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text. [in Ukrainian].
-
20
Shadura, D. M. (2004). Instytut pidvidomchosti v konteksti onovlennia tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva // Naukovyi potentsial maibutnoho Ukrainy na shliakhu do yevropeiskoi intehratsii : Materialy naukovoi konferentsii kursantiv, studentiv ta molodykh naukovtsiv. Dnipropetrovsk : Akademiia mytnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. S. 213–214. [in Ukrainian].
-
21
Shtefan, O. O. (2013). Alternatyvna sudova yurysdyktsiia z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh sprav u krainakh YeS. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti. № 3. S. 55–62. [in Ukrainian].
-
22
Yanovytska, A. V. (2019). Yurysdyktsiia sudu za Tsyvilnym protsesualnym ta Hospodarskym protsesualnym kodeksamy Ukrainy. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. № 4. S. 71-74. [in Ukrainian].
